My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2005 08 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2005 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2005 08 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 2:05:40 PM
Creation date
12/6/2007 12:10:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
5F5
Quality Check
12/6/2007
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2005 08 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />July 12, 2005 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />Council member Keany noted the STK site could also be utilized for cultural or <br />municipal facilities. Mr. Cunningham concurred and stated it would have to be <br />something interesting to draw people. <br />Council member Keany asked) Mr. Cunningham to explain his statement on the <br />quality of the homes. Mr. Cunningham stated his statement referred to the <br />design, value and the niche oi` the homes. <br />Council member Keany asked) Mr. Cunningham for an approximate mileage <br />radius that would be required for a regional draw for a retail facility. Mr. <br />Cunningham stated 3-5 miles. <br />Council member Brown asked) if there is a market for $400,000 housing units, <br />such as patio homes. Mr. Cunningham stated there are opportunities for empty <br />nesters to purchase those types of housing units. He stated the requirements <br />would be for low maintenance, high quality housing units. <br />Council member Brown asked how the empty big boxes stores are filled. Mr. <br />Cunningham stated in some cities, those properties are purchased by the City for <br />municipal and other types of uses. <br />Utility Analysis <br />Public Works Director Tom Phare reviewed the water demand analysis prepared <br />by the Public Works Department. The capacity analysis was based upon the <br />build-out numbers in the February 2005 version of the Comprehensive Plan <br />Update, which was a population range of 24,000 to 24,300. <br />The Public Works Department and project consultants undertook an analysis of <br />the impacts of various land us;e scenarios on the City's utility system. In the <br />context of the Utility Master Pllan, it was concluded that the utility system can <br />accommodate the land use scenarios being contemplated. <br />Wastewater Utility System <br />• The City's current Wastewater Plant is permitted for up to 3.4 million <br />gallons per day (mgd). <br />• The current Wastewater Treatment Plant site can accommodate up to 4.2 <br />mgd. <br />• No major improvements to transmission mains or lift stations are needed <br />other than Areas 3 & 4. <br />Water Utility System <br />• The City's current water treatment capacity is 13 mgd. <br />• The City's Howard Berry Water Treatment Plan can be readily expanded <br />from 5 mgd to 10 mgd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.