My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 03 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 03 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
3/20/2013 2:08:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 03 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 11, 2013 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />Stewart informed the applicant this building is located in the Jefferson Place <br />Subdivision, which is currently under review for a survey. <br />Public Comments – none <br />Koertje stated the structure should be considered eligible for landmarking. <br />Stewart agreed. <br />Lewis asked if the applicant was okay with the naming of the house. <br />Vogelsberg agreed. <br />Stewart inquired more about the accessory structure. <br />A discussion ensued about accessory structures and whether they should be <br />specifically included in landmarking requests. <br />Koertje stated is should be up to the applicant. <br />Vogelsberg stated they would like the garage included in the landmark application. <br />Koertje made a motion to landmark the structure based on architectural and social <br />significance. He added the landmark should include the garage. <br />Fasick seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried 6 – 0. <br />PUBLIC HEARING – Landmark Request – 927 Main <br />Robinson presented staff’s report. He stated the structure has retained the architectural <br />form on the street facing façade, including the false front, however the windows, doors <br />and siding have all changed. Through architectural integrity (form) and the social <br />history, staff recommends approval. <br />Koertje asked if the windows on the facade were in the same general location. <br />Robinson answered in the affirmative. <br />Stewart asked what portion of the building was requesting landmarking. <br />Robinson answered the commercial portion, plus 20 feet of the residential portion. <br />Watson asked what was the significance of 20 feet of the residential portion. <br />Lewis stated that dimension matches the size shown on the assessor’s card.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.