My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 03 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 03 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
3/20/2013 2:08:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 03 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 11, 2013 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />Lewis recommended the HPC should give some homework to the applicant to bring <br />back to the March meeting. <br />Watson recommended acquiring an architect to help with the additional information. <br />Zaremba agreed and discussed his phasing ideas. <br />Watson asked staff if the HPC could make a motion to move this forward to City Council <br />approving the commercial component of this structure. <br />Lewis stated she would recommend someone from the HPC should volunteer as design <br />assistance. <br />Zaremba wanted to be sure a decision would not be binding. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />The final recommendation was to not make a decision tonight, continue the request to a <br />date uncertain, and couple the landmark request with a PUD and SRU and come back <br />later. <br />Stewart made a motion to continue this item to the next meeting. <br />Zaremba recommended to continue it until he had more information. <br />Lewis seconded the motion. It was approved through voice vote. <br />Stewart asked for a design volunteer. <br />Lewis volunteered to be the HPC liaison. <br />Koertje volunteered to help with tax credit research. <br />PUBLIC HEARING – Demolition Request – 701 Walnut <br />Robinson presented staff’s report. The structure has architectural integrity and social <br />significance. He recommended a 30 day stay be placed on the application. <br />Susan Fengler, applicant, presented. She passed out photos to show the quality of the <br />house, which she believes is in poor condition. She stated the garage is in really bad <br />condition as well. <br />Stewart asked if a structural assessment had been completed. <br />Fengler answered no, but she could have one done. <br />Robinson asked the HPC to enter an email into record. <br />Stewart read from the email which asked for the structure to be required to remain.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.