My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 04 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
4/18/2013 12:19:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2013 04 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The proposed 24 foot by 24 foot garage could fit in this location in conformity with the <br />requirements of the LMC. The proposed second story living space would likely not fit <br />under the 20 foot accessory structure height limit; however, there is 33 feet between the <br />front of the existing house to the front setback line that is also available for an addition to <br />the existing house. Staff finds there is room for additional development on the site in <br />conformance with the Municipal Code which will allow the home to be reasonably <br />developed. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. <br /> <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. <br /> <br />The house was built in its present location in 1974. The location of the home and the large <br />front setback does not prevent a detached garage from being constructed consistent with <br />the LMC. However, the large front setback of the home does prevent the homeowner from <br />constructing an attached garage consistent with the LMC. The applicant did not create the <br />hardship of an excessive front setback for the construction of an attached garage. Staff <br />finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br /> <br />The variance, if approved would permit the construction of a 27 foot tall structure within 3 <br />feet of the rear property line. A structure of this height on the rear property line would be <br />out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has not <br />been met. <br /> <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is <br />the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville <br />Municipal Code that is in question. <br /> <br />The requested variance is not the minimum amount of variance that will afford the <br />applicant relief in the form of a functional garage. As stated earlier in this report, staff finds <br />that the addition of a garage could be accommodated within the requirements of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code. The proposed 27 foot tall garage with additional living area on <br />the second floor encroaches 22 feet into the required 25 foot rear setback. Staff finds that <br />the proposed variance is not the minimum variance that will afford the applicant relief. <br />Staff finds this criterion has not been met. <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS: <br /> <br />Public notice was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. At <br />the time of this report’s creation, staff had not received any comments regarding the <br />application. If additional comments are received prior to the hearing, that information will <br />be presented at the hearing. <br /> <br />STAFF COMMENTS AND BOARD ACTION: <br /> <br />Staff finds variance criteria 3, 5, and 6 in Section 17.48.110 of the LMC have not been met <br />and therefore recommends denial of the variance request. <br /> <br /> <br /> 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.