Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville Special City Council Meeting <br />February 12, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Levihn stated that there have been a lot of complaints about neighborhood parking <br />around the churches. He voiced his belief that there is a potential for the same problems <br />in the downtown residential area. He favored a plan creating new parking spaces along <br />Front Street that fairly assesses businesses. <br /> <br />Brown stated that there are many short-term solutions, but projections should be made for <br />the next five years. He emphasized that the best locations have to be determined and then <br />the cost of the construction of the parking lots has to be allocated. He stated that there has <br />been discussion of an exemption for smaller businesses, of 999 usable SF. The <br />exemption would grant 2 spaces at no costs. <br /> <br />Eric Hartronft stated that at one time there was a parking plan based on using the railroad <br />right-of-way, which did not materialize. He reviewed a plan that would utilize angled <br />parking along Front Street and head-in parking on one side of Walnut Street. He <br />estimated that 72 parking spaces could be obtained this plan at a very moderate price. <br /> <br />Mayer voiced disagreement with residential neighborhoods absorbing commercial <br />parking. <br /> <br />Garrett McCarthy, Old Louisville Inn, 740 Main Street, Louisville, CO voiced his belief <br />that the residents loving near downtown have to accept that the streets in front of their <br />homes are subject to commercial parking. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that would be true if the downtown area remained constant. However, the <br />downtown merchants wants to expand and it is inappropriate to expect the residential <br />areas to absorb the needs for commercial parking. <br /> <br />Jim Tienken, Attorney at Law, 726 Front Street, Suite B, Louisville, CO stated that the <br />area is constantly changing and it is inappropriate to lock the parking in residential areas <br />to the needs of five years ago. <br /> <br />Sisk agreed that the residential area will absorb some of the commercial parking, but <br />should not be required to absorb the entire needs of the downtown businesses. <br /> <br />Ronda Grasso, CADCO Inc., 916 Main Street, Louisville, CO stated that it would be a <br />long time before 400 cars are parking on LaFarge Avenue. She stressed that the <br />merchants should not be responsible for the parking needs for the next 25 years. <br /> <br />Keany suggested that there could be parking on one side of the street for long-term <br />parking and the other side for short-term parking. <br /> <br />Tienken stated that would require enforcement of the parking. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that only a limited amount of parking enforcement would be required. <br />Council members concurred. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />