Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville Sustainability Advisory Board <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 17, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />Meg asked how to place the chicken issue on a ballot this fall. Emily instructed her to check <br />with the City’s clerk. <br /> <br />Discussed was how to address owners who lose interest in raising chickens. The <br />consensus was that it was a non-issue. People would handle chickens the same as they do <br />cats and dogs - perhaps donate to the humane society, place ads on Craig’s list, or list them <br />on the Boulder free list. <br /> <br />Also discussed were other issues that may be of concern; noise, routine inspections by the <br />city, financial impact on the city, coops’ distance from property line, coops on rental property, <br />coyotes, and disposal of chicken poop in Western Disposal bins. <br /> <br />Debbie suggested providing as much information as possible from other municipalities <br />regarding issues/problems. She advocated being prepared to state how other cities handle <br />those issues. <br /> <br />Mary Ann summarized the plan forward: a draft paper will be developed and send to LSAB <br />for review and comment. She will also forward the draft to Troy and to the public attending <br />tonight for review and comment. Emily and Dave will work with Malcolm to get the issue <br />scheduled for a Council study session. <br /> <br />Sarah said that she knew many people who were interested in chickens. She can obtain <br />comments from them and pass on to LSAB for incorporation in draft recommendation. <br /> <br />Emily suggested that Mary Ann ask Troy Russ about the coyote problem in Louisville and <br />how it is being handled. <br /> <br />Dave said to offer best practices to the Council in the white paper. <br /> <br />VII. Report on Building Code Board of Appeals status (Andy) <br />Deferred to next month due to Andy’s absence. <br /> <br />VIII. Update on Urban Gardens (Mary Ann) <br />Mary Ann summarized the project’s status; she has begun putting together a package for <br />the Council that includes a description of the management structure, a timeline of the <br />garden’s development, and the city’s involvement. <br /> <br />The location was discussed as well as aspects such as parking, noise, and access. Andy <br />had previously offered to provide a sketch of the design for the Council package. <br /> <br />Mary Ann asked what the Council might be concerned with/require information on. <br />Differences between this garden and the one at Harney Lastoka, and whether or not a non- <br />profit status would be required were suggested as concerns. <br /> <br />Emily suggested contacting Louisville Middle School to see if they would be interested in <br />helping with construction. <br /> <br />Emily volunteered to discuss the topic with Council members prior to the study session. <br />