My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 05 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 05 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
5/29/2013 11:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 05 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 15, 2013 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />Koertje asked if this was a public hearing, or do they need to come back through as a <br />demolition request. <br />McCartney stated he was unsure since these were train cars and not structures. <br />Stewart stated this was more like a pre-conference meeting where we are providing <br />direction to staff to forward to City Council. <br />Koertje asked if the structures shown on the vicinity map needed to be included as well. <br />McCartney stated the other structures were not over 50 years old. <br />Fasick asked about the State Farm building. <br />McCartney stated the structure would be remaining. <br />Koertje asked if Front Street was being built punched through. <br />McCartney answered in the affirmative. <br />Stewart stated the development of the alley, behind the adjacent single family homes to <br />the south, was a good idea. He added he felt as though the proposed development was <br />compatible with the existing single family neighborhood. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the specifics of the development. <br />Stewart stated he would like to see the trains repurposed if at all possible. <br />Fasick asked if these trains could be wheeled down to the Grain Elevator. <br />Discussion ensued regarding this comment. It was determined the trains are most likely <br />no longer mobile. <br />Stewart stated he would provide comments to staff for Planning Commission. <br />Updates – <br />Grain Elevator <br />McCartney updated the HPC that City Council directed the Economic Development <br />Director to move forward with the Olde Town Group and ask for a more detailed <br />phasing process. <br />Stewart thanked staff for their hard work on the State Competitive Grant for the Grain <br />Elevator. <br />Watson asked if this would assist our HPF in expenses. <br />McCartney stated it would.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.