My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #4
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2013 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:05 PM
Creation date
6/21/2013 12:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2013 04 16 - PG 222 - ATTACHMENT #4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic and Market Assessment City of Louisville, CO <br /> Population and Households <br /> Trends in population and household growth can signify an area's capacity for economic development <br /> from a workforce perspective. Increases and decreases in population and households often parallel the <br /> availability of employment, or lack thereof. Although the City of Louisville actually saw a decrease in its <br /> population from 2000 to 2010, Boulder County experienced a 1.1 percent increase, compared to a 9.7 <br /> percent increase for the nation over the same period. The cities of Superior and Broomfield saw <br /> astounding population and household increases from 2000 to 2010. The state experienced relatively <br /> robust population increases in population of 13.6 percent and households of 15.6 percent. <br /> In contrast to the slight decline in population in Louisville, the number of households increased 5.1 <br /> percent over the decade, due in large measure to the 8 percent decrease in average household size. <br /> Figure 2:Population and Households <br /> Geography Population Households Avg.HHSize <br /> 2000 2010 Change 2000 2010 Change 2000 2010 Change <br /> ICity of Louisville 18,868 18,376 -2.6% 7,165 7,529 5.1% 2.62 2.41 -8.0%I <br /> City of Lafayette 23,197 24,453 5.4% 8,844 9,632 8.9% 2.54 2.62 3.1% <br /> City of Superior 9,011 12,483 38.5% 3,381 4,496 33.0% 2.67 2.78 4.1% <br /> City of Broomfield 38,272 55,889 46.0% 13,833 21,414 54.8% 2.77 2.60 -6.1% <br /> Boulder County 291,288 294,567 1.1% 114,793 117,629 2.5% 2.45 2.44 -0.4% <br /> City of Denver 554,636 600,158 8.2% 251,435 263,107 4.6% 2.27 2.22 -2.2% <br /> State of Colorado 4,301,261 4,887,061 13.6% 1,659,308 1,918,959 15.6% 2.53 2.49 -1.6% <br /> Source:US Census <br /> The addition of new residents will be, in large part, contingent upon the availability of jobs, the provision <br /> of housing, adequate public services to accommodate population, land use regulations and perceived <br /> quality of life. Expansion of the permanent population recognizes the need to retain and expand existing <br /> businesses in addition to attracting new ones, as residents will expand the labor force and offer <br /> disposable income to fuel local businesses. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.