My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 05 21 - PG 160 - ATTACHMENT #3
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2013 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 05 21 - PG 160 - ATTACHMENT #3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:05 PM
Creation date
7/10/2013 1:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2013 05 21 - PG 160 - ATTACHMENT #3
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Colorado 7—Step Partial Take Appraisal Process — Eminent Domain <br /> The purpose of this appraisal was to develop a compensation estimate for the reasonable market value <br /> of the property actually taken; compensable damages, if any, to the residue after take; and special <br /> benefits, if any, to the residue after take. Referred to as the modified state before—and—after rule, steps <br /> to develop a compensation estimate for the acquisition of real property are: <br /> 1. Larger Parcel Value Before Take <br /> The first step in the appraisal process is to develop the reasonable market value of the subject larger <br /> parcel had there been no taking or any effect on value due to the proposed transportation project. The <br /> Jurisdictional Exception Rule of USPAP applies to Standards Rule 1-4(f) in this step. In Standards Rule 1- <br /> 4(f), anticipated public or private improvements must be analyzed for their effect on value as reflected <br /> in market actions. This is contrary to law for eminent domain appraisal. Jurisdictional exception <br /> authorities are Uniform Act, Title III, § 301(3); 49 CFR § 24.103(b); 5 24-56-117(1)(c), C.R.S.; and CJI — <br /> Civ. 4th, 36:3. <br /> "Any decrease or increase in the fair market value of real property prior to the date of valuation caused <br /> by the public improvement for which such property is acquired, or by the likelihood that the property <br /> would be acquired for such improvement, other than that due to physical deterioration within the <br /> reasonable control of the owner, shall be disregarded in determining the compensation for the <br /> property." (§24-56-117(1)(c), C.R.S.) <br /> 2. Value of Part Taken (including easements acquired) <br /> The second step involves the same USPAP Jurisdictional Exception Rule as in step 1. In this step, the <br /> reasonable market value of the land or property actually taken is developed. The value of land taken is <br /> based on its value as part of the whole or the larger parcel. Value of improvements taken is based on <br /> their contributory value to the larger parcel, (49 CFR § 24.103(a)(2)(iv), 55 38-1-114(2) and 115(b), <br /> C.R.S.,and CJI—Civil 4th, 36:3) <br /> 3. Residue Value Before Take <br /> The third step is the reasonable market value of the residue before the property actually taken has been <br /> acquired. This step sets the initial basis for the ascertainment of damages and/or special benefits to the <br /> residue. The reasonable market value of the residue before the take is the mathematical difference of <br /> step 1(larger parcel value before take) minus step 2 (value of part taken). <br /> 4. Residue Value After Take (including encumbered easement areas acquired) <br /> The fourth step is to develop the reasonable market value of the residue after the real property actually <br /> taken has been acquired and proposed project improvements have been constructed. In this step, the <br /> reasonable market value of the residue after the taking is no longer subject to the Jurisdictional <br /> Exception Rule to USPAP Standards Rule 1-4(f). Any decrease or increase in the reasonable market <br /> value, if any, of the residue after take due to the proposed public project needs analyses. The influence <br /> of the proposed public improvement is considered except for any damages or benefits shared in <br /> common with the community at large. <br /> The market value of the residue after take is predicated on the "as is" or "uncured" condition of the <br /> residue after the acquisition. Any decrease or increase in value of the residue after take is based on <br /> market evidence, Damage to the residue must be established before a cost to cure can be considered to <br /> mitigate some or all damage. Special benefits may accrue to the residue after take as a result of the <br /> project. <br /> Bonnie Roerig &Associates, LLC Real Estate .Analysts - 'Valuation Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.