My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 07 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 07 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:19:25 AM
Creation date
7/10/2013 2:20:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2013 07 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />June 10, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Menaker prefers: <br /> Option A with the addition of the arch from Option B <br /> Hardscape Option B <br /> Plant Material Option A, likes more formal landscaping <br /> <br />Mayor Muckle prefers: <br /> Option B with less mass <br /> Hardscape Option: hybrid (organic on the west and more linear on the east) <br /> Plant Material Option: less formal landscape using reuse water <br /> <br />Commissioner Hernandez <br /> Option B with lower mass <br /> Hardscape Option: (see additional comments) <br /> Plant Material Option: should be compatible with people enjoying the space <br />and not just visually pleasing or interesting <br /> <br />Commissioner Gorsevski prefers: <br /> Option B <br /> Hardscape Option: hybrid (organic on the west and more linear on the east) <br /> Plant Material Option: less formal landscape using reuse water and likes the <br />idea of trees in the pedestrian walkway <br /> <br />Additional comments regarding the Gateway Design: <br />Several Commissioners expressed concerns about lighting in the pedestrian <br />walkway and underpass. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding the density of pedestrians and cyclists and the <br />width of the sidewalk. It was suggested that the retaining wall could be rounded <br />to prevent injury and include access to the natural areas adjacent to the <br />underpass. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hernandez thinks the plaza on the eastside should be constructed <br />with water bibs and electrical setup for vendors and events. The path on the <br />west side should be expanded to include a downhill bike lane and should not be <br />a dismount zone. <br /> <br />b. Village Square Redevelopment Application for Assistance <br />Aaron DeJong provided a summary of the project. Redevelopment of the area <br />will cost an estimated $31,000,000. Loftus Development requests LRC <br />assistance in constructing public infrastructure improvements. These public <br />infrastructure improvements include: storm sewer improvements, water <br />infrastructure, sidewalks and street lights.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.