My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 07 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 07 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:09:17 PM
Creation date
7/30/2013 3:17:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 07 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 17, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />Robinson stated he would need to apply for an Alteration Certificate once the landmark <br />is approved. He added a building assessment would need to be done prior to the <br />painting. <br />La Grave asked how long the process would take. <br />Robinson stated it would take about 3 months from the time of the landmark to receive <br />approval of the grant, which requires City Council approval. <br />Haley asked if there was a matching requirement in commercial grants. <br />Robinson stated there was then he gave a rundown of the grant amounts and when the <br />matching would be required. <br />Haley asked Villa if he was hoping to paint this summer, regardless of the grant or not. <br />Villa said his plan was to paint until he was approached by the HPC regarding the grant. <br />He stated he understands the concern of painting once only to find out more siding <br />would need to be removed requiring the building to be painted again. <br />Haley stated she believed this structure was definitely eligible for landmarking. She <br />stated she understands the building needs to be painted but she is concerned about the <br />building being painted twice. <br />Griffin asked if only the street facing facades could be painted. <br />Discussion ensued regarding Griffin’s idea. <br />Watson stated he is most interested in getting the sidewalk away from the building. <br />Haley asked if Villa had a preference on how to approach the project. <br />Villa said he liked the idea of only painting the street facing façade. <br />Stewart asked staff what the proposed landmark name was. <br />Robinson stated Lackner Tavern, because that is what the National Registry had. <br />Stewart stated he thought the building was named Germainia or Track Inn. <br />Robinson stated Lackner Tavern was what Bridget Bacon recommended. <br />Watson stated he should consider moving forward in painting the structure without the <br />grant. <br />Robinson reminded the HPC painting is limited to 10% of the preservation grant <br />amount. He stated the applicant could use the signing bonus to paint the street facing <br />façade and then come back through the appropriate grant process.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.