My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 07 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2013 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
7/30/2013 3:19:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2013 07 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The lots on the either side of the applicant’s section of Eisenhower Drive have similar <br />topography to the applicant’s property and there are other lots in the Ponderosa <br />subdivision that have similar topographical conditions; however, the slope of the applicants <br />lot is not a condition that exists throughout the subdivision. The majority of the homes in <br />the subdivision are built on flatter lots. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property cannot <br />reasonably be developed in conformity with the provisions of Title 17 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code. <br /> <br />Due to the slope of the lot, the main entrance to the home from Eisenhower Drive is on the <br />second story. The existing deck is accessed from the second story where the kitchen and <br />living space are located. The 8 foot wide, 120 square foot deck was originally built on the <br />second story to provide main floor access to outdoor space. Staff finds it is reasonable for <br />a home to have access to outdoor living space on the same floor as the kitchen. The <br />existing eight foot wide deck does not provide sufficient space for outdoor gathering. The <br />extension of the existing deck would provide for a reasonable outdoor gathering space <br />adjacent to the main living area of the house. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />4. That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the applicant. <br /> <br />The steep topography of the lot and the location of the existing deck in the rear setback <br />were not created by the applicant. Staff finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br /> <br />The deck extension will not impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent <br />property. The eastern portion of the deck is set back approximately 17 feet from the <br />property line where the municipal code would permit it to be 7 feet from the property line. <br />The proposed deck is located approximately 90 feet from the home to the south. Staff <br />finds this criterion has been met. <br /> <br />6. That the variance, if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief and is <br />the least modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the Louisville <br />Municipal Code that is in question. <br /> <br />The applicant has requested a variance to allow for a deck located within the required <br />setback on the rear of the property. Staff finds the addition of the deck that encroaches 2 <br />feet into the rear setback is the minimum modification possible to enable the applicant to <br />construct a functional outdoor living space adjacent to the main floor of the house. The <br />encroachment into the rear setback is minimal and does not encroach any further into the <br />setback than the existing previously permitted deck does. Staff finds this criterion has <br />been met. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.