My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2002 05 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2002 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2002 05 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:41 PM
Creation date
11/26/2003 9:24:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/21/2002
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2002 05 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />May 21, 2002 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Keany questioned why the system of adjusting water is being changed from ordinance <br />form to resolution form. He voiced his concern that Council or some future Council may <br />face a serious situation or drought and use an emergency ordinance, but if a resolution is <br />used instead, there may be some concern of abuse. <br /> <br />City Attorney Sam Light explained one reason to change from ordinance to resolution <br />form, is that ordinances are codified into the Municipal Code, while resolutions are not. <br /> <br />Mayer commented that some fees, such as the application and processing fees, are done <br />administratively and noted that there is a potential to abuse the fee structure through <br />ordinance. He stated that if the water rates are changed, it should be on a new billing <br />cycle. He suggested that the 7,000-gallon minimum be reduced. He urged Council to <br />allow the citizens greater flexibility in terms how they conserve water. <br /> <br />Sisk addressed the question of whether rates should be increased by ordinance or <br />resolution. He stated that the water conservation plan is already in place and the <br />resolution would allow the information to be dispersed more readily to the citizens. <br /> <br />Davidson concurred with Council member Mayer that the 7,000-gallon minimum should <br />be reduced. He stated that a Council is trying to establish a plan and determine how well <br />it works. <br /> <br />Van Pelt stated that emergency water restrictions were very appropriate given the current <br />drought situation, however she did not believe it is the best long-term solution for water <br />management. She stated that Council can now step back and analysis what is the best <br />way to manage the water resources for the future. She noted that the citizens gave very <br />valid point in terms of managing water consumption within their own households. She <br />voiced her opinion that watering twice a week does not give the flexibility for the long- <br />term water management. <br /> <br />Brown concurred with Council member Van Pelt, that Council can receive feedback from <br />the conservation measures. He felt that the citizens could manage their water <br />consumption within their households. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Tom Phare reported on information on the first four days of the <br />water restriction (May 17 - May 20). He stated that average water demand has been 3.8 <br />million gallons per day. He noted that 10 day ago the average demand was 6.3 million <br />gallons of water per day. He stated that the weather has been cool and there has been <br />added moisture, so that it might take a week or two of continual monitoring to determine <br />the overall effects of the water conservation measures. <br /> <br />Van Pelt commented that a lot of decrease in water consumption can be attributed to <br />public awareness and the responsible actions of Louisville citizens. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.