Laserfiche WebLink
August 23, 2013 <br />To the members of the Planning Department and Board of Adjustment for the City of <br />Louisville, CO: <br />We live on a cul -de -sac in Pine Street Park, in a three -story house that backs onto <br />Pine Street. The ground drops by one full level from the front - where we have a <br />garage and an entry door on the main level - to the back, where we have an <br />unfinished, walkout basement. Sliding doors on the back of the house are located at <br />the basement level of the southwest corner, and at the main level of the southeast <br />corner just off the kitchen. Our very modest, main -level deck is accessed through <br />this main -level sliding door. <br />This deck is as old as the house (> 20 years old), and it has deteriorated to the point <br />of needing replacement. We would like to replace it with an improved version that <br />can comfortably accommodate a grill and a modest dining table (the deck we have <br />now is stocked only with a grill and a few stackable chairs). This would require an <br />expansion of the deck's area, but we have come to learn that this would not be <br />permissible without a zoning variance that allows us to exceed our legal lot <br />coverage limit. Our neighborhood falls within Louisville's Residential Estate (RE) <br />zoning district that restricts lot coverage to no more than 20% of total lot area and <br />specifies a minimum allowable lot area of 12,000 sq. ft. Our feeling is that, since the <br />size of our lot, at -4,600 sq. ft., is only 38% of the minimum specified by the RE <br />code, it is therefore ill- fitted to this zoning district and a relaxation of our coverage <br />limit should be granted. <br />Responses to Zoning Variance Request Criteria <br />1. That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as <br />irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or <br />other physical conditions peculiar to the affected property; <br />The most exceptional physical circumstance of our lot is its small size, <br />-4,600 sq. ft., which is far less than the minimum 12,000 sq. ft. size <br />mandated for RE properties. Indeed, it is far less even than the 7,000 sq. ft. <br />minimum size mandated for Residential Low Density (RL) properties in <br />Louisville. <br />2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located; <br />While our lot is well to the low side of the mean size in Pine Street Park, it is <br />not extremely unique. The majority of properties in our neighborhood were <br />originally developed to substantially exceed the 20% RE coverage limit. The <br />City has recognized that many properties in Louisville's RE zoning district <br />were originally developed more in accordance with the RL zoning code, <br />