My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2013 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2013 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2013 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:34 PM
Creation date
10/16/2013 8:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/2013
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2013 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 1, 2013 <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />Council member Keany stated he misunderstood the information and would have <br />moved to approve the regulations two weeks ago, even if the moratorium was put into <br />place. He felt the Council's hands were tied. <br />City Attorney Light explained a moratorium can be repealed sooner than the expiration <br />date if Council chooses. The moratorium does not preclude Council from giving staff <br />direction to bring back regulations sooner. If the moratorium is not repealed sooner, the <br />expiration date is December 31, 2014, based on input from the last City Council meeting <br />to allow for a potential ballot issue, if Council desires to go to a vote. He explained <br />Amendment 64 provides if a local government desires to have a ballot issue asking <br />voters if they wish to prohibit retail marijuana, the first opportunity is November of an <br />even numbered year. Therefore, the first opportunity would be November of 2014. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton stated regardless of whether there is a moratorium or not, no <br />new licenses, except medical dispensary conversions, may be issued until January <br />2015. Planner I Robinson explained new retail businesses may apply for a retail <br />marijuana license on July 1, 2014 and may open on October of 2014. <br />City Attorney Light explained beginning October 1, 2013, only an existing medical <br />marijuana establishment, in good standing, can apply to the state for retail marijuana <br />license and can begin operations on January 1, 2014. New market entrance cannot <br />begin operations until October 2014. <br />Council member Keany asked for clarification that only the two current medical <br />marijuana businesses could apply. City Attorney Light confirmed the two current <br />businesses could apply. <br />Council member Loo did not see a problem approving a moratorium and discussing <br />regulations later. <br />Mayor Muckle called for public comment. He asked the public to address whether they <br />support or oppose medical and retail marijuana and not the moratorium. Mayor Pro <br />Tem Dalton suggested the public be allowed to speak to the moratorium, because it is <br />on the agenda. There was consensus. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />The following members of public spoke in favor of retail marijuana and opposition to a <br />moratorium. <br />Michael Frontczak, 643 Fairfield Lane, Louisville, CO <br />Dru Whitledge, Louisville, CO spoke on behalf Boulder County ACLU <br />Shawn Coleman, 3250 O'Neal Circle, Boulder, CO, <br />Craig Small, 127 Pheasant Run, Louisville, CO <br />Christian Cederberg, 1244 Grant Street, Denver, CO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.