My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2013 09 10
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2013 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2013 09 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:50:22 AM
Creation date
10/17/2013 2:04:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2013 09 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: METHODS FOR CREATING HISTORIC DISTRICTS <br />DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 <br />PAGE3OF3 <br />The LMC requires the consent of at least 40 percent of the owners in a proposed district <br />for an application to be considered under the Designation with Owner's Consent <br />section. Applications for designation of a district will not be considered if there is written <br />opposition to such district formation from at least 40 percent of the property owners <br />within the district boundaries. When calculating the district's owner percentage, each <br />property receives one vote. <br />IMPLICATIONS <br />The stated intention of Chapter 15.36 is “to create a method to draw a reasonable <br />balance between private property rights and the public interest in preserving Louisville's <br />unique historic character by ensuring that demolition of, moving, or alterations to <br />properties of historic value shall be carefully considered for impact to the property's <br />contribution to Louisville's heritage.” <br />The methodology for creating a historic district specified by the LMC may contradict this <br />intent in two ways: <br />1)Homeowner consent –The consent of the landowner is required when <br />considering a potential landmark, yet it is possible to establish a historic district <br />without the consent of every homeowner in a potential historic district. <br />Specifically, the LMC allows a scenario where City Council could approve the <br />designation of a district with only forty percent of the home owners explicitly <br />agreeing to the designation and some percentage under forty opposing the <br />designation, and the remaining home owners abstaining. For example, if only <br />thirty percent of home owners in a proposed district opposed the formation of the <br />district, those home owners could be included against their will. <br />2)Noncontributing structure inclusion within a Historic District – A Historic <br />District boundary does not have to be contiguous and a noncontributing structure <br />can be excluded from the district. However, it is also possible to include a <br />noncontributing structure in a historic district. This raises questions of whether <br />Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) monies should/could be provided to <br />noncontributing structures in a historic district. It also raises the question of <br />whether a noncontributing structure should/would still be required to submit <br />alteration certificates for permitted exterior work. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Not applicable <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Discuss policy issues related to the methodology of creating a Historic District. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />None <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.