Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 16, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Stewart presented Steve Poppitz with his Certificate of Apprecia <br />would personally deliver the other certificates. <br />Pre-filing Conference – 740 Front (Old Louisville Inn) <br />Robinson stated the building owner, Garrett McCarthy, requested the pre-filing conference to <br />discuss an upcoming application for landmarking the Old Louisvil <br />Garrett McCarthy presented his plans for preservation, restorati <br />wanted to discuss the opportunity of using previous expenditures <br />He gave a rundown of all of the previous preservation projects h <br />years of ownership. <br />Stewart asked if McCarthy had any general scope of what might be <br />preservation efforts. <br />Steve Simms, business partner, stated there was a building asses <br />of the expense is going to come from the foundation. <br />Chuck Sanders, project architect, discussed conceptual ideas of <br />have already reviewed the Alteration Certificate criteria as wel <br />Handbook. He stated they are proposing to have a single story a <br />building, but want to make sure the new construction definitely <br />historical structure. <br />Watson stated he was happy to see the conceptual ideas and was a <br />back along the front façade to give a clear definition between t <br />recommended doing the same in the rear of the building. <br />Sanders acknowledged Watsons recommendation. He stated he is ve <br />Secretary of Interior standards and will be sure the standards a <br />Koertje inquired if the building has a flat roof and asked if th <br />Sanders stated they are designing the roof to drain to the back <br />Stewart understands the issue behind needing more assurity befor <br />He stated this is something that has been stated by previous app <br />of incentives for landmarking. He added he agreed the $6,000 bu <br />release prior to landmarking. He stated the previous preservati <br />the in-kind amount. <br />Koertje stated the current ordinance language does not seem to a <br />be used as in-kind. He added there is $75,000 available for new <br />commission has yet to have a project which asked for both a pres <br />construction grant. He inquired if the rehabilitation and new c <br />done at the same time. <br />