My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2013 10 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2013 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2013 10 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:50:22 AM
Creation date
11/6/2013 2:01:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C6
Supplemental fields
Test
SSAGPKT 2013 10 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: 2014 DOWNTOWN PATIO PROGRAM DISCUSSION <br />DATE: OCTOBER 22, 2013 <br />PAGE 3 OF 4 <br />3) Administration — Staff estimates it will cost $2,700 per year to administer this <br />program. <br />4) Patio depreciation — The patios must be replaced when they have exceeded their <br />useful life and the program should have funding available at the time it is needed. <br />Current replacement cost for one 12 foot patio is $12,000. Assuming a 15 -year <br />life and 3% inflation, $1,005 is needed per 12' patio per year to amass enough <br />funds to replace the patio when needed. Yearly total is $18,094. <br />5) Insurance - $500 (staff estimate). <br />6) Storage - $500 (staff estimate). <br />Total estimated costs to operate the program for the 2014 season are $26,794. This <br />translates to a cost per 12 linear feet of patio of $1,488. <br />Staff developed several fee scenarios to provide revenue to maintain and expand the <br />program. <br />Staff presented detailed information on various options to the BRaD committee on <br />September 9, 2013. Comments received from the meeting included; <br />• The fee should be modest. <br />• The financial goal is not to make revenue but to cover costs. <br />• The City should retain control of the patios. <br />• Perhaps the fee should cover only maintenance and storage <br />• It would be surprising if restaurants did not participate because it is such a <br />successful program. <br />• Aesthetics are important. Having visual continuity down the street has value. <br />Staff also held a public meeting on September 9, 2013 and invited all downtown <br />restaurants to attend. Representatives from 5 restaurants attended the meeting; <br />• Jim from Empire Lounge <br />• Adam from Melting Pot <br />• Pete from The Porch Deli <br />• Bob from B.O.B.S. Diner <br />• Patrick from the Bittersweet Cafe <br />Staff walked through the proposed guidelines and detailed cost options. Participants at <br />the meeting expressed the following comments and concerns: <br />• The timeframe the patios would be out was acceptable. <br />• The restaurants should not have to pay at all. It should be a benefit of being a <br />downtown restaurant. <br />• The patios do not provide a significant increase to their sales. <br />• Some restaurants would like to have more patios available for their business. <br />• Some restaurants will likely not participate if a fee is charged. <br />• A rental fee of $720 per 12 foot patio is too high. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.