Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 11, 2013 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br /> <br />The applicant stated there could be between 50 to 125 people <br />Pritchard also asked about what type signage they would want. <br />The applicant stated they had not discussed so details were not available. <br />Tengler discussed concerns with lighting and parking for the evening events. <br />McMillan explained the lighting would be part of the building permit for any <br />remodeling of the building. The parking would also be ADA compliant. The parking <br />concerns should be addressed by the recommended condition of approval for the <br />parking agreement with the property owner to the north, which is the City. <br />Public Comment: <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 W. Chokecherry Dr, stated he had a discussion with a <br />Louisville family that has been using the Jump N Rope program for several years. He <br />does not see a concern for the parking because the events will not be as large as the <br />Street Faire events. He encouraged the Commission to approve the request. <br />Bill Simmons, 515 Front Street, stated his comments are not about the use of the <br />building but for the exterior lighting and signage of the building. He requested a <br />condition of approval be added to limit the signage to the north side of the building <br />only. <br />Commission Questions of Staff and the Applicant: <br />Pritchard requested McMillan address some of the concerns identified by Simmons. <br />McMillan reviewed the Downtown Sign Code regulations as well as the lighting <br />standards for the site. <br />Moline asked if the signage could be limited to the north side of the building only. <br />McMillan stated the Downtown Sign Code would not permit signage on the north side <br />of the building. Signage is limited to the street facing side of the buildings. The sign <br />code also addresses the type of signs and the type of lighting for signs in the <br />downtown area. <br />Simmons stated the commercial site is the closest site to the residential area of town. <br />He asked if the economic development factor was going to trump the quality of life in <br />Louisville. <br />Russ reminded the Commission that the type and placement of signage for the site is <br />not part of the review for the special review use. He stated the Commission is to <br />consider only if the use is within the permitted used as an SRU. <br />Russell asked how the signage is regulated. <br />Russ stated the signage is regulated at the time of building permit. The application is <br />review by staff following the requirements of the Downtown Sign Code regulations. <br />O’Connell asked how the lighting is regulated. <br />Russ stated the lighting is considered a Life Safety Issue and will be address at time <br />of building permit and reviewed following the IBC. <br />Summary – Staff and Applicant: <br />None heard. <br />