My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 06 27
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2013 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2013 06 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:06 PM
Creation date
11/19/2013 1:30:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
6D4
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2013 06 27
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
General Fund Forecast <br /> 25,000,000 - <br /> 20,000,000 <br /> 15,000,000 evenue <br /> =ExpendRures <br /> Fund Balance <br /> 10,000,000 - =Minimum <br /> 5,000,000 - - <br /> 00 pA 01, O'S OA Oh 00 O'1 04 Obi ^O ^� ,�L ,.^1 ^h h� <br /> 1, y0 y0 1, ,LO 1, ,y0 1, 1, �O ,y0 �O ,y0 1, 1, 1, y0 l• 40 <br /> As the graph indicates, based on all of the interfund transfers, revenue assumptions, and <br /> expenditure targets, the General Fund reserves would stay above the minimum <br /> desirable level (15% of projected expenditures). Please keep in mind that these amounts <br /> do not include departmental requests for 2014. However, I have included an addition <br /> $300,000-$350,000 of additional operational costs for each year between 2014 and <br /> 2018. While our forecast for the General Fund, reflecting the transfers noted above, <br /> shows a significant decline in reserves between 2015 and 2018, we do not expect to <br /> continue significant transfers in 2019 or subsequent years and we will make adjustments <br /> as necessary then and in future years to ensure that total expenditures in most years are <br /> at least slightly less than revenues in order to maintain adequate reserves over time. <br /> The C-I-P projects within the Capital Project Fund are divided into three general <br /> categories, related to the function of the expenditure: <br /> • General Government <br /> • Parks & Recreation <br /> • Public Works <br /> The following charts summarize the total five-year costs of each recommended project <br /> compared with the total five-year costs of the departmental requests. The Capital Project <br /> Fund was unable to support the total requested C-I-P of $41.1 million. By reducing the <br /> scope of some projects, delaying some projects, eliminating some projects, and <br /> incorporating the interfund transfers, the recommended C-I-P amounts to $40.9 million. <br /> It is important to highlight that the C-I-P provides funding for two major transportation <br /> projects—$3.5 million in 2013-2015 to pay for Louisville's commitment to the $12.5 <br /> million McCaslin/Highway 36 Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), and $3.0 million in <br /> 2016-2017 to pay for Louisville's commitment to the $17.4 million State Highway 42 <br /> corridor improvements. These projects would not be possible without leveraging <br /> Louisville's contribution in partnership with funding from other sources including the <br /> Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), the Regional Transportation District <br /> VI <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.