Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 21, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />Stewart asked if there were any plans for the City Shops property on Empire Road. <br />McCartney stated there were no submittals for the redevelopment of the City Shops. <br />Public Hearing - none <br />Presentation City Attorney, Ethics Training <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, presented Ethics and Training. He stated this is a quasi-judicial <br />board and it is important to learn how to deal with issues involving private property. <br />Stewart asked if this counts as training. <br />Light stated no. <br />Watson asked why we have to do both. <br />Light stated this is ethics training specifically for the HPC. He added open government training <br />is more general. <br />La Grave asked how you look at noticing for certain projects. <br />Light stated the Louisville Municipal Code already states what action needs public notification <br />neighbors. <br />La Grave asked if Light could comment on what fair notice is and who should get noticed. <br />Stewart stated the premise is all interested parties should be notified. <br />Light stated all ordinances have a standard publication of posting, publishing and notification. <br />He added case by case notices are dangerous because you are making decisions off the <br />books. <br />La Grave stated his inquiry is to determine if our notification process is fair. <br />Light stated legal notice in the Sunday newspaper is not effective but it is required. He added <br />notice on the internet and through email is what most communities are doing now, but it should <br />still the most effective. <br />Stewart asked if the demarcation of ex parte contact is once an application has been <br />submitted. <br />Light stated you should consider both sides of the discussion when considering ex parte. Any <br />pre-discussions are not recommended. <br />Watson stated the clear line is an application. <br />