Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />August 20, 2002 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Johnson addressed separate smoking areas in establishments and stated only completely <br />self-contained areas are smoke-free. He commented that it was a wise decision to include <br />outdoor events. He voiced his support of the Council and the ordinance. <br /> <br />Garrett McCarthy, 740 Front Street, Louisville, CO, stated that he is the owner of the Old <br />Louisville Inn. He applauded Council for banning smoking in restaurants and outdoor <br />eating areas. He voiced his opinion that the smoking ban would increase his business. He <br />commented that the ordinance is heavy-handed and asked that the taverns be exempt <br />from the ordinance because their principle business is not food service. He stated that he <br />supports non-smoking for restaurants and requested consideration for taverns. <br /> <br />Susan Morris, 939 W. Maple Court, Louisville, CO, thanked Council for moving forward <br />with the smoking ordinance. She explained that, although the Coalition for a Smoke Fee <br />Louisville has not sought additional signatures on their petitions, 100 residents have <br />volunteered their support of the ordinance. She stated that Paul Austin, of Austin <br />Chiropractic, has pledged support of the smoking ban. She commended Council for their <br />leadership on the smoking issue. <br /> <br />James Hayden, 217 S. Cleveland Avenue, Louisville, CO, owner of Gentleman Jim's Bar <br />& Grill, explained the smoking ordinance would ruin his business. He stated 85% of his <br />customers are smokers who come to his establishment to drink and smoke and noted the <br />ordinance is extremely unfair to smokers. He explained his business is a bar that serves <br />meals and not a restaurant that serves alcohol. He noted there are plenty of smoke-free <br />restaurants in Louisville where non-smokers can dine. He stated his understanding the <br />ordinance proposes to protect employees of bars and restaurants and commented that <br />employees have a choice as to whether to work in a smoking establishment or not. He <br />explained that he is a smoker, and started when the dangers of cigarette smoke were not <br />known, and now, he cannot quit. He asked Council to reconsider the smoking ordinance. <br /> <br />Chuck Wright, 103 S. Washington Avenue, Louisville, CO, voiced his opposition to the <br />ordinance. He explained that he is a sixteen-year resident of Louisville, and both he and <br />his wife are non-smokers. He reported that they recently visited a local smoke-free <br />Italian restaurant, however, smoking was allowed in the patio. He stated the restaurant <br />did not have a smoky odor and, smokers were enjoying dining on the patio. He stressed <br />the ordinance is too extreme and can turn peaceful people into criminals. He stated <br />people could make their own choices on what type of restaurants they choose to dine in. <br /> <br />Robert Castellino, 366 Owl Drive, Louisville, CO, stated that he is an asthmatic and grew <br />up in a smoking environment. He explained that, once he was not living in a smoky <br />environment, his asthma greatly improved. He reported that he breathes freer and is <br />happier away from smoke-filled rooms. He noted that children and non-smokers rights of <br />clean health are taken by second hand smoke. He stated the ordinance is critical for <br />public health and safety. <br /> <br /> <br />