Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />August 20, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Slobe stated she was a member of three study groups; one was through the American <br />Heart Association. She explained that since there is no history of heart related problems <br />in her family, she contributes her heart condition to cigarette smoking. She voiced her <br />support for the ban on smoking. <br /> <br />Jay Berger, 1016 Main Street, Louisville, CO, stated he supports the ordinance, and has <br />been a proponent of smoke-free public places for ten years. He stressed the issue of <br />individual right has been discussed, however the only issue that should be considered is <br />that of health and safety. He explained that once a proprietor opens his doors to business, <br />it becomes a public place and subject to government safety standards. He suggested a <br />provision be added to the ordinance, which would prohibit smoking within 50 feet of an <br />exterior entrance to public places. <br /> <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 W. Willow Street, Louisville, CO, stated she was pleased to hear the <br />City was considering an ordinance banning smoke in public places. She addressed the <br />tavern exclusion and noted that alcohol is a trigger for participated addiction and trigger <br />behaviors should not be encouraged. She voiced her empathy for tobacco addicts, and <br />stressed they have the right to engage in smoking in their own homes, however they do <br />not have the right to subject other people to dangerous chemicals. <br /> <br />Doug Grinbergs, 530 W. Sycamore Circle, Louisville, CO, expressed his support of the <br />ordinance and urged City Council to move forward. He explained the City of Boulder's <br />ordinance provides for separate ventilated spaces, but noted that Tulagi's has a smoking <br />room, and even though it is separately ventilated, smoke filters through the rest of the <br />building. He requested a non-smoking buffer around public places and referenced a Santa <br />Barbara County, California ordinance, which provides for a 20-foot non-smoking buffer <br />around commercial buildings and legislation contemplated by Nova Scotia, Canada, <br />which would prohibit smoking at building entrances. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mayer thanked the public for their comments. He acknowledged that it is a health and <br />safety issue and stated he would support the ordinance as written. He stressed that <br />government has jurisdiction over quasi-public facilities. <br /> <br />Sisk voiced his support of the ordinance banning smoking in public places. He expressed <br />concern that private clubs were included in the ordinance, and stated that if the public <br />were invited, non-smoking should be observed; however, restricting a private club would <br />be unfair. He voiced support for a non-smoking buffer, however, stated it could be <br />considered at another time. He thanked the Smoking Task Force for their work. He <br />emphasized it is a health issue and that he fully supports the ordinance. <br /> <br />Brown stated that an overwhelming majority of the public has expressed their support for <br />the ordinance banning smoking. He reported on discussions with citizens on exemptions <br />for certain businesses. He voiced his belief that some businesses will be put in jeopardy. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />