Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />November 19, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Terry Grayson, GPMS, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, stated they have worked on solving the <br />conditions and have Staff and Commission support. He noted the additional drive-thru <br />and menu board would relieve the traffic congestion and create a safer parking lot. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mayer voiced his concern over the plant use list given the recent drought. He addressed <br />sod replacement and noted there have been problems in the past with commercial <br />landscaping maintenance. He requested a note on the PUD, and all future PUD's that the <br />landscaping be maintained. He voiced his concern over the reduction of parking spaces, <br />and asked if ordering more quickly would eliminate traffic congestion. Grayson stated <br />the addition of a second drive-thru and menu board would cut the time in half. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Grayson to explain why this plan is safer for pedestrians. Grayson stated that <br />currently there is one lane, and with the addition of a drive-thru lane and menu board, the <br />traffic will channel through more quickly. He stated that stamped concrete is proposed to <br />create the illusion of a pedestrian crosswalk, alerting motorists to slow down. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if they propose two single lanes to the left of McDonald's, which would <br />connect to the drive-thru. Grayson stated there is only one lane, which would turn into <br />two lanes on the left side of McDonald's. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if that were also true of the east side of McDonald. Grayson stated the east <br />side would remain one lane. <br /> <br />Sisk asked if the two windows would increase McDonalds business. Grayson stated the <br />intent is not to increase business, but to alleviate traffic congestion. He noted if the drive- <br />thru line is backed-up, customers generally tend not to stop. <br /> <br />Keany commented that, if the existing bluegrass were replaced with a low moisture grass <br />it would not match the balance of the grass. He asked Grayson to address the Planning <br />Commission's concerns over staffing problem. Grayson stated the Commission's concern <br />was not a matter of staffing, but a matter of getting the orders to the customers. <br /> <br />Keany asked if the increase in signage was more than one menu board. Grayson stated <br />that there is a second menu board and two ordering kiosks. <br /> <br />Mayer asked that the new sod be of lower moisture wherever practical. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light reminded Council of the two Planning Commission's recommended <br />conditions, which have been met. <br /> <br />MOTION: Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 40, Series 2002, with <br />two conditions: 1 .) Staff and applicant examine the practicality of adding low moisture <br />sod, 2.) A note on the PUD requiring maintenance of landscaping, seconded by Levihn. <br /> <br /> <br />