My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 12 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2013 12 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
1/2/2014 7:46:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2013 12 16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Nlinutes <br />November 19, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />• Found photo documentation of the building as a two story structure. <br />• Newspaper articles stated the structure sank 6' in height in 1895 due to subsidence. <br />• The owner then filled in the area and used the second floor as the first floor. <br />• The building currently has asphalt roofing and asbestos siding. <br />• The State recommended the period of significance is 1880 to 1959, when Jessie Niehoff <br />died. <br />• This period of significance incorporates all of the improvements which have been done, <br />including the asbestos siding. <br />• Humphries Poli made a recommendation for the asbestos siding to be removed. <br />• The State does not agree the asbestos siding needs to be removed. <br />• There appears to be some sort of wood clapboard siding beneath the asbestos siding. <br />• If you do restore the building to a certain period of time, the State wants very detailed <br />documentation of the findings to establish this period of significance. Because of this, <br />we have chosen 1948 due to the amount of documentation existing for this time period. <br />If this time period is chosen the windows will need to be restored. <br />Stewart asked when the last addition as made. <br />Crissler stated the last addition was made in 1951. <br />Watson inquired if there was a foundation holding the structure in place. <br />Crissler stated there was work done in the basement during the last renovation of the <br />structure. <br />Watson asked if the foundation was treated wood or concrete. <br />Crissler stated there are concrete stem walls and wood on grade. She stated the assessment <br />recommends the wood on grade needs to be addressed. <br />Watson asked why the State would not want to have the structure brought back to a period of <br />significance when the asbestos siding was not in place primarily because that would be a more <br />aesthetic building. <br />Crissler said it is based on the Secretary of Interior Standards and they believe the change to <br />asbestos siding happened during the period of significance, which is based on when the <br />original family lived there. She believed pre -World War II would make sense. <br />Griffin stated the structure only has asbestos siding for 2 years of the period of significance <br />and wood clapboard for over 60 years. <br />Crissler said they are looking at the evolution of the building over time. <br />Griffin recommended keeping only a portion of the asbestos to show the evolution. She stated <br />the state believes the evolution is just as important as establishing the period of significance. <br />She added the proposal was to remove the asbestos shingle and to remove the asphalt <br />roofing. However the State did not agree. She is willing to continue discussions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.