Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 12, 2013 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />McCartney presented from Power Point and stated the project is located on McCaslin, <br />northwest of Century and McCaslin. He added the proposed development includes the <br />following: <br />o Zoned CC <br />o Commonly known as the Centennial Pavilion Shopping Center <br />o Requesting an additional sign on the northeast corner of the development <br />o Intended to provide identity for the uses located at the back of the <br />development (west) which do not have direct roadway frontage <br />o Part of the existing signage issue is the placement of temporary signs <br />along McCaslin which are not permitted per the Louisville Municipal Code <br />(LMC) <br />o The new sign will be designed to comply with the existing signs and sized <br />to comply with the Commercial Development Design Standards and <br />Guidelines (CDDSG) <br />o New sign will act as a direction sign <br />• Staff recommends approval of thi <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Moline asked when a request to mo z, triggers tional review by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />McCartney stated the only time a sign would be •rough back to Planning Commission <br />would be for sign variances. <br />Tengler asked how code enforcement is handled for sign violators. <br />McCartney gave a step by step process for how the City handles sign violators. <br />Tengler , e dir c yto received by an adjacent homeowner and whether staff <br />believes the proposed sign complies with the existing signs. <br />McCartney stated he believed the proposed sign does comply with the existing signs. <br />Brauneis made a motion to enter the letter into record. <br />Pritchard stated he believed there are inconsistencies in the existing signs on the <br />development. <br />McCartney stated the PC is permitted to make any design recommendations. <br />Brauneis asked how this sign might work with a future sign placed on the undeveloped <br />property to the north. <br />McCartney stated this sign is small enough that is should not create any issues with a <br />future sign. <br />Pritchard asked about the sign areas for the existing signs. <br />