My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 01 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 01 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 9:12:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2014 01 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The applicant obtained a structural investigation report for the property, completed by <br />John C. Baur, of Baur and Associates Consulting Engineers, and a historic structure <br />assessment, completed by Chuck Sanders, architect. The assessments (attachment 3) <br />recommend many items for the preservation and restoration of the structure. <br />The applicant then had its general contractor, Horizon West Builders, provide cost <br />estimates for the recommended work (attachment 4). Staff is comfortable with receiving <br />only one cost estimate because it was provided by the general contractor for the overall <br />project, and it would not be practical for the applicant to receive multiple bids on a large <br />project of this nature. The cost estimates are based on the general contractors own <br />prices and bids from anticipated subcontractors. Staff's review of the estimates finds <br />the projected costs reasonable. The work proposed is necessary for the rehabilitation <br />and future functional use of the building, though not all of it is eligible for grant funding <br />from the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF). <br />INCENTIVES: <br />According to Section 15.36.030, City Council is afforded the legislative ability to provide <br />preservation incentives for those wishing to landmark their historical structure. Once <br />the structure is approved for landmarking, the applicant may act on one or more of the <br />incentives offered. <br />As part of the landmark process, City Council approves two incentives: a $10,000 <br />signing bonus and a $6,000 structural assessment grant. The signing bonus has no <br />restrictions on how it may be used, and the assessment grant will be used to reimburse <br />the applicant for the structural assessment. <br />Resolution No. 2, Series 2012, authorizes grants for landmarked commercial structures <br />of up to $181,000, leaving a potential $165,000 remaining to be awarded for this <br />structure. That is divided between a $65,000 flexible grant, requiring no matching, and <br />a $100,000 focused grant, requiring a 100% match from the applicant. <br />The $100,000 focused grant may only be used for preservation and restoration, <br />including "measures directed towards sustaining the existing form, integrity, and <br />materials of a historic property." Therefore only exterior and structural work are eligible <br />for the focused grant. <br />The $65,000 flexible grant may be used for other purposes in addition to those eligible <br />for the focused grant. "Sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing <br />systems and other code - required work to make the property functional" is eligible for a <br />flexible grant funding. Also, "up to 10% of a grant may be used for one -time actions <br />considered routine maintenance," such as painting. <br />Below is the list of requested grant funding, along with staff's recommendation on <br />whether the request is eligible for funding and how much of each request should be <br />funded out of each grant category. The items cover the recommended work in the <br />structural assessments. Details for each item are in the application (attachment 2). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.