Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br /> Special Meeting Minutes <br /> February 24, 2014 <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br /> in the state which is included within the Home Rule Charter. This speaks to the <br /> commitment the community has made to ethics. <br /> Mr. Krob has practiced in Colorado for twenty years and is an ethics expert; a <br /> sole practitioner specializing in local government law; serves as Town Attorney <br /> for Winter Park, Frasier, Hot Sulfur Springs, and Grandby; served as County <br /> Court Judge in Grand County for ten years and was a District Court Magistrate <br /> for five years. Mr. Krob has experience with ethics as a law practitioner; a <br /> member of the Judiciary and an academic. He is an Adjunct Professor at the <br /> University Of Denver School Of Law, teaching ethics and is the co-editor of an <br /> ethics column and a member of the Ethics Committee for the Colorado Bar <br /> Association. <br /> Special Counselor Krob outlined the ethics training agenda to highlight the City's <br /> general ethics policy; a comparison between the Louisville Municipal Code of <br /> Ethics and the Colorado State Statutes; the inter-relationship between the City <br /> Council members and City employees; quasi-judicial proceedings, and some <br /> studies of hypothetical situations. <br /> GENERAL POLICIES UNDERLYING ETHICS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT <br /> OFFICIALS <br /> • Open government and public participation. <br /> • Those entrusted with positions in the City government must commit to <br /> adhering to the letter and spirit of the Code of Ethics. <br /> • Those in positions of public responsibility should be committed to high <br /> levels of ethical and moral conduct. <br /> • Promote people's faith their government is acting for the good of the <br /> public. <br /> • Promote a harmonious and trusting relationship between the City <br /> government and the people it serves. <br /> • Strive to avoid situations that may create public perceptions of violations <br /> of the Code of Ethics. Perceptions of such violations can have the same <br /> negative impacts on public trust as actual violations. <br /> • Promote honest government. <br /> • Prohibit use of public office for private gain. <br /> • Encourage quality individuals to serve in public office by not placing undue <br /> limitations on their ability to earn a living and pursue other interests. <br /> LOUISVILLE CODE OF ETHICS vs. COLORADO STATE STATUTES <br /> The Louisville Code of Ethics is the more restrictive of the two. In instances <br /> where the Louisville Code of Ethics and the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) <br /> both address a particular issue, both need to be considered to determine which is <br /> the more restrictive. In other instances, if the conduct is not addressed in the <br /> Code of Ethics, but addressed in C.R.S., the provisions of C.R.S. apply. <br />