Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 03 13

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 9, 2014 Page 3 of 6 • Enhance the bar experience in front with bar tables and stem wall, accentuating the historic bar • Landmarking the building to preserve its original character • Restoring original windows along Front Street — using similar windows on addition • Designed as single story and flat roof so not to dwarf existing building • Have worked with adjacent property owner since additi their existing building ill be very close to Gstalter gave details of how the existing building will b f and preserved. Russ stated the interior improvements do not req The applicant could begin doing interior work to Commission Questions of Applicant: Brauneis asked if the applicant has a comme the plain permit. ndmarkin® PUD approval. Gstalter stated he understands the there are elements beyond their con they will be successful in receiving the ion for needin'a flood ing with nthe Id building and understand eers' findings, they believe rmit. Tengler inquired if the Gstalter stated the on both sides of the ing or ®- ing the existing bar. the entry into the addition will be made oftoe( was con • o it but the required stairway would take out too much s ing to be worthwhile it. Gsta ated they floor on the interi O'Connell sign. d if the current PUD would allow for the reconstruction of the old Tivoli Robinson stated i rrently part of the PUD, so they would need to amend the PUD to allow for the sign. Pritchard asked if they were looking to rebrand. Gstalter stated they are looking into it and assume the new operator would want to change the name. Pritchard asked staff if the sign could change from now until City Council. Russ stated no. Signs which are not included in the PUD must then comply with the Downtown Sign Manual.