Laserfiche WebLink
SUBJECT: <br />DATE: <br />PUBLIC OUTREACH, PUBLIC NOTICE <br />FEBRUARY 4, 2014 <br />PAGE 5 OF 9 <br />hearing is provided. In addition, the City Charter requires City Boards and staff follow <br />additional rules regarding ethics and open and accessible government. These include: <br />The City must provide advance notice and a reasonable opportunity for anyone <br />to speak at and present evidence and argument at the hearing; <br />The City must make a record of the proceeding (minutes), including all <br />information that is considered in making a decision. The City will collect letters; e- <br />mail messages and documents submitted before the hearing and will include <br />them in the record of the hearing. If there is an appeal of the Council's decision, <br />the reviewing court will look to see if evidence in the record supports the <br />Council's decision; and, <br />When the matter being considered is "quasi- judicial ", City Council and its <br />recommending boards and commission members must not consider any <br />information received outside the public hearing (this is called "ex parte" <br />communication), so everyone has a fair opportunity to hear the evidence and <br />argument at the public hearing. This need and desire for a fair hearing is the <br />reason City Council and board and commission members reviewing land use or <br />other quasi- judicial applications cannot discuss the application outside of the <br />hearing. <br />City Council adopted Ordinance No.1647, Series 2013 to fill some missing gaps in the <br />public notice process for quasi - judicial proceedings. In essence, the ordinance <br />established basic expectations of consistency in the LMC requirements to ensure there <br />is adequate notice to impacted individuals of a pending public hearing. <br />CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION <br />