My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 04 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 04 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:09 AM
Creation date
4/16/2014 10:25:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2014 04 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 13, 2014 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />A AT &T Antennae — Louisville Recreation Center: A request for a special <br />review use (SRU) to allow for the placement of 3 sectors of four (4) 8 foot <br />tall rooftop antennas, totaling 12 antennas. <br />• Applicant, Owner and Representative: Cliff Spencer <br />• Case Manager: Scott Robinson, Planner 11 <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Camera on February 23, 2014. Posted in City Hall, the Library, the <br />Recreation Center, the Police and Court Building and mailed to surrounding property <br />owners on February 21, 2014. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />Tengler stated he worked for Comcast but did not believe , was a conflict of <br />interest. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Robinson presented from Power Point: <br />o Zoned PCZD -C /R <br />o 15 new cell antenna canisters .ed on top of the Loui Recreation <br />Center <br />o There will be an equipment shelty- tht ° #st side of the bui[ding <br />o Canisters will extend rooftop meas to 41'6" in height, 10 ' above <br />roof parapet <br />o Must comply with CM such a ching building materials. <br />o The applicant is proposr ant n a -signs t h comply with the existing <br />antenna and t e building or <br />0 Staff belie RS cn °_- e be t and therefore recommends <br />approv <br />O'Connell made a <br />n to e`nto recor: of the emails received in regards to this <br />project. Tengler seco <br />Commis z( t <br />n <br />O'Co <br />district. <br />asked fi the <br />proved by voice vote. <br />e staying below the height permitted in the zone <br />Robinson st <br />they do. <br />O'Connell asked - antenna are the same height or taller than the existing. <br />Robinson stated the new antennae are taller. <br />Tengler asked why they were taller. <br />Robinson stated the 4G and LTE antennas are taller than the older antennae. <br />Rice asked where the height impact and views are evaluated. <br />Robinson stated the criteria asks about impacts on the surrounding properties and staff <br />believes the proposed height does not impact the views. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.