My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 04 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 04 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:09 AM
Creation date
4/16/2014 10:25:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2014 04 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 13, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Marianne Fantellas, 818 Trail Ridge Drive, stated Junior covered most of her <br />comments. She added she is concerned about her view and the impact to her property <br />value and would like a return to the community if we are losing property values. She <br />asked what the City is receiving in the Lease Agreement to pay for our property value <br />loss. <br />Tin Tang, Nighthawk, stated he is concerned of health impacts from the higher radiated <br />frequencies coming from these antennae. He stated cancer has been linked to these <br />radiated frequencies. <br />Brauneis made a motion to submit the new emails submitted. gler seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried by voice vote. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission. <br />Brauneis asked staff to comment on the public notice <br />Robinson stated there are 12 antennae in 15 c <br />Brauneis asked if staff was comfortable leg <br />Robinson answered in the affirmative. <br />Tengler asked about the lease agre' <br />ith the lift notice. <br />Robinson stated he did not have any <br />City Council meeting. <br />Russ stated the deta <br />b cussed at an upcoming <br />e not ific un h' <br />Tengler asked abo <br />Robinson <br />with FC <br />Ta n <br />residen <br />safety F terns. <br />ed if the FCC <br />'properties. <br />Robinson st <br />stated the urba <br />SRU has been approved. <br />\eer stating the emissions are consistent <br />sideration the close proximity of the towers to the <br />ure how the FCC came up with those limitations. He <br />are lower than the rural allowances. <br />Pritchard asked if th ,96 FCC health and safety rulings took into effect considerations <br />similar to Louisville. <br />Robinson stated he was unaware of the 1996 rulings but there wasn't anything in our <br />code specific to the FCC rulings. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Robinson stated staff recommends approval based on the criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.