Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 19, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 16 <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Chris Fuller, Chair <br />Yes <br />Leslie Ewy, Vice Chair <br />Yes <br />James Stuart <br />Yes <br />Christine Niska <br />Yes <br />Andrew Meseck <br />Absent <br />Gunnar Malmquist <br />Yes <br />Carl Borrmann <br />Yes <br />Motion passed: <br />6 to 0 <br />A 623 Garfield (Graham Bailhache). A variance " st to allow a 3.5 foot <br />building separation where 5 feet is required. • d Avenue, s 1/2 of Lot <br />5 and all of Lots 6 and 7, Block 11, Louisv I eights. e No 14- 012 -VA. <br />i. Applicant and Representative: Graham B <br />ii. Owner: Same <br />iii. Case Manager: Sean McCartney, Pry 'fanner <br />1) Open Public Hearing <br />2) Opening Statement by Chair <br />3) Public Notice and Application Certification <br />4) Disclosures <br />5) Staff Presentation and Questions of staff <br />6) Applicant Presentation and w: mg ns of applicant <br />7) Public Comment <br />8) Applicant discussion of public <br />9) Closing statement by staff and a' <br />10) Close public hearing and Board <br />Fuller asked for verificati' roper p <br />McCartney verified b <br />both mailed to sure <br />Daily Camera on <br />2014. <br />Stuart m <br />and th <br />pas. <br />Fulle <br />had des <br />taken care <br />pplic s to bpi <br />sing prop owner <br />h2,201 dthepr <br />rd this evening are complete, and were <br />March 4, 2014, published in the Boulder <br />ty was posted on posted on March 4, <br />ded a motiF'at all requirements have been satisfied <br />y the applicants have been properly filed. Motion <br />d if anyone a <br />-d and asked <br />one were <br />hea had any objections to the hearing procedures he <br />ere were any other preliminary matters that needed to be <br />a rd. <br />Fuller asked fo clo= es from the board members for any site visits, ex parte <br />communications , y conflicts of interest or required disclosures on both <br />applications <br />All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any <br />conflicts of interest for both applications. <br />Fuller stated that for the requested variance to be approved, five (5) of the six (6) votes <br />would need to be affirmative. <br />Fuller asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />The applicants indicated they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />