My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2014 05 05
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUSINESS RETENTION & DEV COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Business Retention and Development Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Business Retention and Development Committee Agenda and Packet 2014 05 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:09:37 PM
Creation date
5/12/2014 10:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BRADPKT 2014 05 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT UPDATE <br />DATE: MAY 5, 2014 <br />PAGE2OF3 <br /> Louisville is not a regional retail center, but a community center. The ‘barbells’ <br />are Boulder and Westminster. Louisville retailers will tend to be daily needs types <br />of retailers. Louisville is perceived as a bedroom community. <br /> Density does drive retail, both rooftops and daytime population. Being high <br />density doesn’t have to be the play. Louisville needs to decide what they want to <br />be. <br /> Cannibalization is a very important issue to retailers. Adding another store in <br />Louisville or neighboring market can impact other stores nearby. <br /> Louisville should talk up the high incomes, high education <br /> It would be helpful to provide traffic pattern information, daytime population, and <br />disposable income information <br /> Incentives really help <br /> More residential units help retail. It has been important to show that for Louisville <br />Plaza. <br /> One thing to help improve retail in Centennial Valley is to remove the <br />landscaping that blocks visibility. <br /> Right now, McCaslin doesn’t have a good story to tell (a broker said McCaslin is <br />a bad story). The 36 Corridor is losing to I-25 and is over retailed. I-25 corridor <br />is the preferred spot for retail today, it has lower cost land, and retailers can build <br />to spec. <br /> Figure out who you (Louisville) want to be then tell your (Louisville) story. <br />Louisville is not going to be high volume – gear the retail to what the community <br />is <br /> Retail may not be the highest and best use for Sam’s Club. With the building <br />selling, the only problems that were solved were Wal-Mart’s problems. <br /> Superior Town Center is challenged from the start. The ‘new downtown’ concept <br />hasn’t proven to work and is missing some key ingredients. <br /> Retail rental rates aren’t scaring away tenants. Rates do come into play on new <br />construction <br /> Retail retention along McCaslin will be difficult. They are looking to other <br />corridors. <br />I would like to hear from the committee members what themes they heard from the <br />meeting. Also, I would like to brainstorm ideas/strategies to begin addressing the <br />themes. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.