My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2014 06 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2014 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2014 06 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:08:07 PM
Creation date
6/16/2014 3:10:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7A3
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2014 06 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
518
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Nlinutes <br />May 20, 2014 <br />Page 13 of 20 <br />• Must meet standards to maximum extend practical <br />• Must meet water quality requirements <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Stolzmann asked about Section 3.3 and felt the exceptions were too <br />loose and unfair to the rest of the City. She liked the rest of the manual. <br />Planning and Building Director Russ stated this section allows for a joint pond to be <br />created so as to meet stormwater detention rules. Council member Stolzmann felt it <br />allowed for not following the stormwater requirements. <br />Public Works Director Kowar stated there is always a requirement for a drainage report <br />on any development, including these areas. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Lipton asked if there was a definition section in the manual and if the <br />terms were consistent with the approved comprehensive plan. <br />City Manager Fleming pointed to Figure 3.1 which maps the small area plans and <br />overlay districts. <br />Council member Stolzmann suggested the process remain the same for all non- <br />conforming properties. <br />Planning and Building Safety Director Russ noted there was no change to single family <br />residential which is the majority of Louisville. Each request that comes forward is <br />considered individually. <br />Council member Lipton said tying this to the PUD process gives him comfort and noted <br />this sets criteria to put the burden back on the developer to meet the technical criteria. <br />Council member Stolzmann felt Section 3.3. released these areas from the detention <br />rules. <br />Public Works Kowar didn't feel it released them from the rules but provides a framework <br />for discussion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.