Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Golf Course Advisory Board Minutes <br />April 21 2014 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />held prior to the start of tree work to explain the planting and tree <br />mitigation plan in order allay sensitivity to tree removal <br />c) Cost Estimates. LU provided a more detailed version of the work content <br />but has not updated the cost estimate. This is a concern as several <br />significant costs have changed and planning needs to be done on any <br />“Alternate Items” that can be covered within the cost limit approved by <br />Council. <br /> Cost Increases <br /> Green remediation requires a deeper work on the subsoil: <br />o <br />$300K <br /> Re-seeding all fairways instead of just damaged areas: <br />o <br />unknown cost increase <br /> Pond liners must be replaced on all ponds used for reclaimed <br />o <br />water (per report from Frobel Associates) rather than repaired: <br />unknown cost increase but, per Joe Stevens, similar work at the <br />pond by the ball park cost only $84K and FEMA is expected to <br />reimburse <br /> Cost decreases <br /> Work on the irrigation system is expected to come in $215K <br />o <br />under budget per Irrigation Technologies <br /> Re-grassing using seed rather than sod: unknown saving <br />o <br /> FEMA is expected to reimburse a significant part of the irrigation <br />o <br />replacement <br />d) Other Notes <br /> Inspection reveals that approximately 65% of the irrigation system <br />was damaged by the flood and should be eligible for FEMA <br />reimbursement. The plan is to replace all components of the system <br />with the exception of the main pumping station. The option of using <br />submersible controllers is being reviewed; this is more expensive but, <br />as a mitigation, may be eligible for 100% FEMA reimbursement <br /> Plans for the booster pump are also being reviewed. If replaced in- <br />situ, it would be raised above the flood plain and serviced via a <br />catwalk with appropriate visual screening from Dillon Road. It would <br />be more effective to relocate the pump to beside green #15: this is <br />outside the flood plain, could be integrated with the planned restroom <br />and would allow a smaller pump to be used. This may also integrate <br />with proposed increased use of reclaimed water by Avista, The <br />Springs along with other City facilities. <br /> <br />·· <br />Parks and Recreation Department 749 Main Street Louisville, CO 80027 <br />· <br />(303) 335-4735 FAX (303) 335-4738 <br />www.louisvilleco.gov <br />Parks Recreation Senior Services O <br />Golf <br />