My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:17 PM
Creation date
6/17/2014 2:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2014 05 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 21, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />La Grave stated it appears staff has had difficulty contacting the property owner and asked <br />Cohen why it has been so difficult to reach her. <br />Cohen said he can’t answer that. <br />Fahey asked if he had considered leaving the sign lighting off instead of half lit. <br />Cohen said he would rather not. <br />Watson asked about exterior lighting. <br />Cohen asked if that is what the HPC wanted. <br />Watson said no, it was just an option. <br />La Grave asked if the owner knew he filed the application. <br />Cohen answered in the affirmative. <br />Haley asked if the new sign would look like the old sign or would it look completely new. <br />Cohen said he was not sure. <br />Stewart asked if he had gotten cost estimates on the demolition of the sign. <br />Cohen answered no. <br />Stewart asked for a breakdown of the $16,000 cost he has spent so far. <br />Cohen gave a breakdown which included changing the face from “Pasquini’s” to “Empire”. <br />Public Comment <br />Meg Sandoval, longtime Louisville resident, stated she is concerned the public hearing sign <br />was not very readable. She stated she is worried about the impact if this sign were to be <br />removed. She added she believes there was previous monetary assistance provided by the <br />City and some agreement might exist. <br />La Grave asked staff to find out if there is an easement or other agreement pertaining to the <br />sign. <br />Robinson stated he would research the existence of any agreement. <br />Discussion/Comments <br />Stewart requested the HPC discuss the criteria surrounding the stay. He stated he would be in <br />favor of placing stay because it is a symbol of Louisville, has unique architecture and is a <br />figure head for Main Street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.