My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 06 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2014 06 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:26 AM
Creation date
6/17/2014 2:41:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2014 06 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: CORE PROJECT AREA AGREEMENT <br />DATE: JUNE 9, 2014 <br />PAGE3OF4 <br />The Application for LRC assistance states: <br />“Assistance is generally provided to projects for public infrastructure <br />improvements needed to facilitate the revitalization of property within the <br />Urban Renewal Area. Typical public infrastructure investments may <br />include but are not limited to unifying streetscape elements, improving <br />access and circulation, improving streets and parks, providing for railroad <br />corridor improvements and grade separation, providing for parking, <br />completing utilities.” <br />For the Core Area Infrastructure Bonding to fulfill this requirement, staff has been using <br />the following rationale to decide if improvements are eligible for the LRC bonds; does <br />the improvement serve more than just one development? <br />The Comcast improvements themselves are not eligible for tax-exempt financing <br />because they are for private use. However, certain ‘private use thresholds’ exist in tax- <br />exempt rules, and may not create an issue for a non-taxable issuance if they are a small <br />percentage of the total issuance. There are concerns with further complicating the <br />bonds with tax-exempt and taxable components. Also, these improvements are on <br />private property, only serve that property, and Comcast hasn’t agreed to those <br />improvements. These improvements are a cost to assemble land for DELO’s <br />redevelopment plan. <br />The LRC has stated improvements relating to the private streets are not to be included <br />in the Bonds. The utility infrastructure under the private streets only serves the DELO <br />development. Not including these improvements coincides with previous decisions of <br />the LRC not to include infrastructure serving only one development. <br />The City developing a regional detention facility large enough to alleviate flooding <br />concerns for the downtown area and also serve water detention requirements within the <br />Core Project Area is a benefit for the entire area. DELO wants the LRC Bonds to fund <br />the DELO, Tebo, and Boom payment obligations for the regional detention facility. The <br />other properties within the Core Project Area will have to pay with their own funds to <br />utilize the facility if are required to provide storm water detention to redevelop their <br />properties. Staff believes the regional detention facility should be an allowable <br />improvement. These bonds are being serviced through TIF generated from all <br />properties within the Core Project Area, and that includes more than just DELO, Tebo, <br />and Boom. The LRC bonds for regional detention should then benefit all properties. It <br />should be noted City Council has not directed staff on the concept of regional detention <br />for remediating downtown floodplain issues and serving the Core Project Area. That <br />discussion is scheduled for the City Council meeting on July 1, 2014. <br />Bond Modeling <br />Attached is a revised bond repayment model for the Core Project Area. It was prepared <br />by Alan Matlosz for RMCS. The key assumptions of the model are: <br />1) Delo development consisting of: <br />LOUISVILLE REVITALIZATION COMMISSION <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.