My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 06 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 06 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:35 PM
Creation date
6/18/2014 7:36:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 06 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 3, 2014 <br />Page 8 of 26 <br />1. The City's RFP clearly requested a unit based Pay as You Throw pricing strategy <br />to encourage diversion. The strategy was devised by the City of Louisville and <br />Western Disposal was the only responsible bidder in that context. He felt the <br />diversion pricing should be as important as the average pricing in your <br />consideration and rating. <br />2. Relating to the Emerald Ash Borer, Western Disposal has spent a great deal of <br />time learning how to deal with this problem. Western is the only state - approved <br />facility in the county to treat the materials and allow them to move beyond the <br />quarantined zone. He urged Council to verify any plant is actually approved by <br />the state. Staff is recommending renegotiations with Republic to modify their <br />pricing to meet the RFP. He voiced his belief Republic's proposal did not meet <br />specifications of the RFP. Western Disposal's pricing strategy did meet the <br />requirements. He urged Council to reconsider and commence contract <br />negotiations with Western Disposal. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Lipton inquired about Western's proposed pricing for some sort of <br />extension. Mr. Bruno stated Western Disposal will work with staff for an extension on <br />the contract. He noted their commitment is to their customers and the City of Louisville. <br />Council member Keany stated the alternative to negotiating with a different vendor, and <br />negotiating with Western Disposal would be to issue a new RFP, which can address <br />Council's concerns. An extension may not be a change in the carrier. He felt the RFP <br />should be reissued with more specifics regarding pickup schedules, alternate days and <br />a pricing strategy. He stated the carriers bid in good faith, but the RFP did not <br />accomplish what Council expected it to do. The extension would allow for a new RFP <br />process to be completed. <br />Mr. Bruno stated it was not their desire to extract a penalty for not receiving a contract. <br />It would be a matter of figuring out how to provide continuing services to its customers. <br />Council member Stolzmann was not in favor of issuing a new RFP because she felt the <br />same information would be brought back. She felt there was enough information and <br />public comment for Council to make an informed decision. She stated with the one -day <br />pick -up, the Emerald Ash Borer and the Pay as You Throw program are persuasive <br />reasons to negotiate a contract with Western Disposal. With Western's response, 5% of <br />the citizens will see an increase over six dollars. With Republic's response 25% of <br />citizens will see an increase over six dollars. With all the information before the City <br />Council, they can make a decision tonight. She felt the issues could be worked out and <br />the City could partner with Western Disposal. Then over the next five years the City can <br />look at what is driving the cost and pass those savings on to the community. Mayor Pro <br />Tem Dalton concurred. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.