Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2014 06 18

Home Browse Search

Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes April 16, 2014 Page 2 of 4 ➢ 741 Pine Needle Lane (Jeff and April Mace): A variance request to allow a 26% lot coverage where 20% is allowed: 741 Pine Needle Lane, Lot 30, Pine Street Park Sub. Case No. 14-017-VA. i. Applicant, and owner and Representative: Jeff and April Mace ii. Case Manager: Sean McCartney, Principal Planner The item was approved by voice vote. > 829 Owl Drive (Jon and Emily Fearnow): A variance request for a 25% lot coverage where 20% is required: 829 Owl Drive, Lot 18, Pine Street Park Sub Case No. 14-018-VA. i. Applicant, Owner and Representative: Jon and Emily Fearnow ii. Case Manager: Sean McCartney, Principal Planner Ewy opened the public hearing for 829 Owl Drive. Noition or issues were addressed. The item was approved by voice vote. Public Hearing Item Alp uestions, comments > 1009 Grant Avenue (Douglas Lian): A side setback variance request to allow for a garage addition: Lot 3 - 4, Capitol Hill Sub Case No. 14-020-VA. i. Applicant, Owner and Representative: Douglas Lian ii. Case Manager: Sean et, art a;. $,. cipal Planner, 1) Open Public Hearing 2) Opening Statement by Chair 3) Public Notice and Application Certifi 4) Disclosures 5) Staff Presentation and Questions of sta 6) Applicant Presentation and Questions o icant 7) Public Comment 8) Applicant discussion of public comment, if 9) Closing statement by staff and applicant and Final questions by board 10) Close public hearing and Board discussion and action Ewy revi wed the procedures for the meeting; opened the public hearing; and stated there asix criteria which must be met for the board to approve a variance request. Ewy then stated copies of the criteria are located on the table next to entryway. She asked for verification of proper public notice. McCartney verified both applications to be heard this evening are complete, and were both mailed to surrounding property owners on May 2, 2014, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on May 4, 2014; and the property was posted on posted on May 2, 2014. Stuart moved and Niska seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied and the applications submitted by the applicants have been properly filed. Motion passed by unanimous voice vote. Ewy asked if anyone at the hearing had any objections to the hearing procedures she had described and asked if there were any other preliminary matters that needed to be taken care of. None were heard. Ewy asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on both applications