Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />June 11th, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />8. Tom suggested that there could be language in the plan to provide for temporarily <br />closing properties or sections of properties to protect coyotes that are aggressive due to <br />denning. OSAB agreed. <br />9. Missy and Laura liked the graphic showing the futility of lethal control in the Superior <br />plan and recommended that Catherine see if she could use the figure, or one like it. <br />10. Jeff asked about the proper response for a homeowner who has coyotes coming <br />into their yard, and suggested that there should be a "what to do if there's a coyote in <br />your yard or private property" section in the document. Catherine and Joe suggested <br />that people call 911 and Police would follow the management and response plan. This is <br />another reason why OSAB thinks the private property section should be explicit and <br />called out. Linda suggested that Police might need coyote- specific training if they are <br />being tasked with evaluating whether a coyote encounter is aggressive. Joe said that he <br />would like to see that, too. <br />11. Missy reminded the Board about the historical communication difficulties between <br />Open Space staff and Police, and asked whether this plan provides for a central <br />repository for coyote documentation data. Staff wants Open Space to manage that <br />repository. Helen suggested that Open Space should also report coyote summary data <br />back to the public since we are asking the public to report. <br />12. Laura noticed that the coyote encounter forms say to send them to Catherine's City <br />email address, and she suggested establishing a designated <br />"CoyotesCc�LouisvilleCo.gov" email address where forms could be sent. This email could <br />then be forwarded to Catherine or whoever is in charge of coyote response management <br />at the time. <br />13. Tom mentioned that the response plan doesn't include any sort of longer -term follow <br />up after incidents and attacks, and it might be reassuring to specify a long -term <br />response. <br />14. Missy asked if there is a need for any additional budget for the expanded education <br />and outreach indicated by this document. Catherine said that there hasn't been specific <br />consideration of this additional budget load yet. <br />Laura commented that she thought Catherine has done a very fine job on this draft <br />document, OSAB agreed. <br />IX. Discussion: Survey & Wayfinding Subcommittee Updates <br />The wayfinding subcommittee is waiting to review and provide input on the wayfinding <br />RFP and will report when they have seen it. <br />No action from the survey subcommittee. Tom has not heard from the professor who <br />expressed interest in doing citizen surveys. <br />X. Discussion: Review Materials for Study Session with City Council <br />The study session with City Council is on August 12th. <br />Helen provided OSAB with a draft document to share with City Council for the study <br />session. This was included in the meeting packet. <br />5 <br />