My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Outreach Task Force Agenda and Packet 2014 07 28
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PUBLIC OUTREACH TASK FORCE
>
2014 Public Outreach Task Force Agendas and Packets
>
Public Outreach Task Force Agenda and Packet 2014 07 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:03:39 AM
Creation date
7/30/2014 8:04:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
POTFPKT 2014 07 28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- Events Planning <br />- Neighborhood Liaison <br />- Community Outreach Training and Coordination <br />• The communications tasks mentioned most frequently as being contracted out are printing, <br />graphic design and translation of materials into Spanish. <br />Opinions Offered on Organizational Structure <br />Each bullet under the first two sections represents a different Director. <br />Prefer Centralized Approach: <br />• Communications could work most effectively if it were more centralized (one voice). Given <br />how decentralized things are, there is an opportunity for miscommunication. Things are too <br />informal. <br />• I'm not a big fan of decentralized communications. Media inquiries should be centralized. <br />• Works well to have a well - qualified city PIO. I support having a more centralized <br />communications function, with professional, trained staff to help departments. <br />• As decentralized as it is, communication function is fractured. <br />Prefer Decentralized Approach: <br />• Having a departmental communications person allows us to focus and tell a deeper story. <br />• Having PIO in Police that also covers Fire has worked well. <br />• We have worked on departmental PIO role for four years and it is working well. <br />• Having dedicated Communications person next door is great. <br />• Director wants questions referred to her, rather than having someone speak for her. <br />Departmental expertise and knowing who to contact is very helpful. <br />• Don't see a real prospect for communications to be overly centralized because departmental <br />expertise is needed. <br />• Department is large enough that we need a departmental PIO. Central function can't speak <br />for all departments — there is just too much information and not enough central staff. <br />General Comments from Directors: <br />• City needs to answer the question: What organizational model makes the most sense — <br />centralized, decentralized, or hybrid? <br />• A number of Directors acknowledged that the Communications Division has a big job, that <br />there are a lot of different expectations, and that there is a need to prioritize and clarify roles. <br />• There is expertise in the city on topics such as Social Media. It would be great if that <br />expertise could be shared across the organization. <br />• Have graphic design expertise centralized that could help all departments. <br />• It is important that the Communications Division functions in a consulting role to <br />departments. <br />• There has to be a balance and a reliance on content experts. <br />• Like the idea of a centralized approach, in which the same template is used by everyone. <br />• Not concerned about structure (centralized vs. decentralized) as long as all the key <br />communications functions are addressed well. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.