My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 04 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2014 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2014 04 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:21 AM
Creation date
7/30/2014 3:23:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2014 04 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April; 10, 2014 <br />Page 33of 37 <br />efficient way. It is awkward; arewe building private residences? No, we are giving <br />them an efficient space. This is one option. The second option is to give them the <br />efficiency of paving a parking space while we pave the alleys. That was presented as a <br />possibility of getting more parking spaces into Old Town. <br />REGULATION: From a regulation perspective, it is time to increase our parking <br />requirements?A typical parking ratio for an office is 4 per 1000 SF; we are at 2 per <br />1000 SF. We don’t have transit. We don’t have a lot of public ownership. Should our 2 <br />spaces per 1000 SF, which is low by every measure even in a transit rich environment <br />is low, be reconsideredjust for future development.How about changing our parking <br />payment in lieu of fee to actually reflect the cost of a surface lot, or more importantly, a <br />structure? How about developinga neighborhood on-street parking policy, recognizing <br />that Downtown is impacting Old Town. Is there a parking policy that we need to create? <br />We heard clearly from the residents that they would like to do that. <br />For example, Aspen has a residential permit program in their Downtown but it is open to <br />anyone who wants to buy it. The residents get discounted significantly for their units. <br />They get two and anything beyond that, they have to buy a permit as well. If I am an <br />employer or employee downtown, I can also buy a residential permit and you can park. <br />If not, it is time-limited. It is not prohibited, it is time-limited. If you go to Aspen and you <br />park in the neighborhood, you can only be there one hour or two unless you have a <br />residential permit. They sell permits for visitors to park in the neighborhood. It is a <br />revenue source and a management tool. <br />ACCESS: From an access perspective, improving access by delivering people by any <br />means other than the car. We heard the suggestion to improve directions to the private <br />lots behind the alleys. Increase transit service by working with Boulder County and <br />RTD to get the DASH to be 15 minutes throughout the day and additionally, a route that <br />connects Broomfield to Louisville along Highway 42. Can the City work harder to get <br />premium transit here earlier than later? Improve bicycle friendliness and reduce the <br />barrier on South Boulder Road so people may bike from the northern neighborhoods. <br />MANAGEMENT: From a management perspective, can we work with the Police <br />Department and appropriately proactively manage our resources. We heard two things, <br />behavior and location. Behavior is people blocking driveways or blocking corners and <br />sight lines, throwing beer bottle out. If we managed that, I believe 50% to 60% or more <br />of the concerns of parking in Old Town would go away. Currently, we do not manage it <br />so we get driveways blocked. Regarding management, can we paint the curbs to let <br />people do it without the Police? Aid the motorist to park in the correct locations instead <br />of blocking a driveway. Some residents feel if you are adjacent to the driveway, it is <br />difficult to get in and out even though technically,you are not blocking it. The resident <br />feels you are blocking it. Paint would help. We will probably get most compliance from <br />the motorists who don’t want to block driveways and want to know where to park. It is <br />maintenance of paint but not an extra police officer. You will get a lot of bang for your <br />buck from a management perspective. <br />The other management issue is pushing them to the location you want. What we saw <br />during the day is the office parking lots, the Library included, are not being fully utilized. <br />If we actually had a management program for the neighborhood, either through active <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.