Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 5, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 22 <br />not aware how it applied to the construction of an addition, but stated the rule applies to <br />all classes of liquor licenses. <br />Council member Lipton requested clarification on the separation issue regarding the <br />expansion of restaurant/bars and marijuana establishments prior to making a decision <br />on this matter. <br />Council member Moss noted marijuana establishments would not be able to alter their <br />businesses. She asked for a definition of alter. Planning and Building Safety Director <br />Russ stated the businesses would be allowed to change the inside of their stores. He <br />asked City Attorney Light to address the transfer of ownership issue. <br />City Attorney Light explained the separation requirements are rules adopted by City <br />Council. The City Council has the option to amend the rules. Ordinance No. 1648 <br />amended the moratorium on retail marijuana establishments to allow the existing <br />marijuana businesses to relocate to premises within 1,320' of the existing premises, <br />with compliance of all regulations. The separation between schools would have to be <br />met. He noted the 1,000' separation from a school is direction from the United States <br />Justice Department. <br />Council member Moss asked if the current owners be allowed to transfer their licenses. <br />City Attorney Light explained transfers do not require reevaluation and reapplication of a <br />license. <br />Council member Moss was not comfortable moving forward. She agreed the two <br />marijuana establishments should be notified of the potential effects of the plan. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton felt the Code should be changed. He did not feel any application <br />should damage existing business. He supported continuing this matter and discussing <br />Code changes at the next meeting. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated looking at the PCZD guidelines, one of the uses <br />allowed by right is childcare centers. She asked for clarification on the difference <br />between a childcare center and a preschool. Planning and Building Safety Director <br />Russ explained the Code specifically allows a daycare as a use by right because they <br />are a known use, but preschools, or any class of schools require a Special Review Use <br />to determine the scale of the use. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated she feels a pre - school is a childcare center. She <br />understood the concern over the marijuana facilities, but agreed with Mayor Pro Tem <br />Dalton the Code should be amended. She felt the distances should be reviewed as it <br />creates a conflict elsewhere. She felt following the PUD would promote well - planned <br />shopping centers and facilities that provide a variety of shopping, professional, business <br />cultural and entertainment facilities that create an attractive and pleasant shopping <br />atmosphere. She preferred to approve the application and come back and make <br />changes to the marijuana rules. <br />