My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2014 08 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2014 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2014 08 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:36 PM
Creation date
8/20/2014 8:29:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2014 08 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 5, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 22 <br />not aware how it applied to the construction of an addition, but stated the rule applies to <br />all classes of liquor licenses. <br />Council member Lipton requested clarification on the separation issue regarding the <br />expansion of restaurant/bars and marijuana establishments prior to making a decision <br />on this matter. <br />Council member Moss noted marijuana establishments would not be able to alter their <br />businesses. She asked for a definition of alter. Planning and Building Safety Director <br />Russ stated the businesses would be allowed to change the inside of their stores. He <br />asked City Attorney Light to address the transfer of ownership issue. <br />City Attorney Light explained the separation requirements are rules adopted by City <br />Council. The City Council has the option to amend the rules. Ordinance No. 1648 <br />amended the moratorium on retail marijuana establishments to allow the existing <br />marijuana businesses to relocate to premises within 1,320' of the existing premises, <br />with compliance of all regulations. The separation between schools would have to be <br />met. He noted the 1,000' separation from a school is direction from the United States <br />Justice Department. <br />Council member Moss asked if the current owners be allowed to transfer their licenses. <br />City Attorney Light explained transfers do not require reevaluation and reapplication of a <br />license. <br />Council member Moss was not comfortable moving forward. She agreed the two <br />marijuana establishments should be notified of the potential effects of the plan. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Dalton felt the Code should be changed. He did not feel any application <br />should damage existing business. He supported continuing this matter and discussing <br />Code changes at the next meeting. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated looking at the PCZD guidelines, one of the uses <br />allowed by right is childcare centers. She asked for clarification on the difference <br />between a childcare center and a preschool. Planning and Building Safety Director <br />Russ explained the Code specifically allows a daycare as a use by right because they <br />are a known use, but preschools, or any class of schools require a Special Review Use <br />to determine the scale of the use. <br />Council member Stolzmann stated she feels a pre - school is a childcare center. She <br />understood the concern over the marijuana facilities, but agreed with Mayor Pro Tem <br />Dalton the Code should be amended. She felt the distances should be reviewed as it <br />creates a conflict elsewhere. She felt following the PUD would promote well - planned <br />shopping centers and facilities that provide a variety of shopping, professional, business <br />cultural and entertainment facilities that create an attractive and pleasant shopping <br />atmosphere. She preferred to approve the application and come back and make <br />changes to the marijuana rules. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.