Laserfiche WebLink
Amended on 8/18/2014 <br />Golf Course Advisory Board Minutes <br />July 21 2014 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />6.Staff Update <br />a. Rebuilding project cost update. Joe Stevens reported that, with minor <br />deviations, the project is on budget and provided a hard copy of the <br />updated costs to the Board. LU reported that additional costs were <br />encountered due to groundwater problems with the ponds ($65K) and <br />issues with underlying rock and rubble. LU commented that the original <br />construction of the course left some areas with little topsoil on top of the <br />underlying cobble. The budget contains $200K as an owner contingency <br />and Staff proposes using that amount to authorize the construction of a <br />punchbowl-style putting area and improve the driving range. The chipping <br />green will be rebuilt in its existing position beside the driving range and the <br />new punchbowl green along with a small putting green will be located in <br />front of the clubhouse. The board agreed that these changes added <br />significantly to the attraction of the golf course and unanimously approved <br />going ahead with this added project based on a motion proposed by <br />Dennis Maloney and seconded by Tom Deany. LU estimates the total <br />cost as $186K which is within the owner’s contingency amount. Changes <br />to the driving range include making an arc-shaped teeing area (included in <br />the base quote) and realigning the target areas to reduce the risk of golf <br />balls hitting adjacent homes. Target greens will be created and the <br />furthest out green will be 2500 sq ft in area and seeded with bent grass on <br />a sand base so it can be used as a nursery green if turf replacement is <br />needed on the playing greens. If needed, the punchbowl green can also <br />be used as a donor site. LU is not able yet to release any of their $200K <br />contractor contingency for additional add/alternate options as unknown <br />risks may yet emerge. Within 3 – 4 weeks, the risk scenario should be <br />clearer and, assuming no new issues emerge, LU will consider releasing <br />around $100K of their contingency for add/alternates. Staff reported that a <br />contractor has been found who can run power to the new booster pump <br />for considerably less than the Xcel Energy quote. If this is successful, the <br />cost of the pump is $41K and the cost of running power is estimated at <br />$56K. The $97K net cost will be offset by $65K from insurance to replace <br />the original pump.The Board agreed that Staff had done sterling work in <br />maximizing the funds expected from FEMA. Items are still being worked <br />with FEMA and the final determination is yet to be made. <br />b. Add/ Alternate discussion and GCAB prioritization. In addition to <br />approving the punchbowl putting area, the Board also agreed that Staff <br />should go ahead to provide water and sewer connections to the proposed <br /> <br />·· <br />Parks and Recreation Department 749 Main Street Louisville, CO 80027 <br />· <br />(303) 335-4735 FAX (303) 335-4738 <br />www.louisvilleco.gov <br />Parks Recreation Senior Services O <br />Golf <br />