My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2014 08 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2014 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2014 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:12 PM
Creation date
8/21/2014 9:31:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2014 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 16, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />d. Deck is being placed on the west side, rear portion of the property <br />e. Property backs up to open space <br />. Staff recommends approval for lot coverage request. <br />Questions from Board to Staff: <br />Borrmann asked if the height of the deck, above 30 inches, is part of the reason for the <br />variance request. <br />McCartney answered in the affirmative. <br />Ewy asked if this project had been publicly notified. <br />McCartney answered in the affirmative. <br />Applicant Presentation and questions from the Board to the applicant: <br />No presentation was given. <br />Questions of Staff /Applicant <br />No questions were asked because the Board of Adjustment feels as though this issue <br />comes up every month. <br />Public Present in Opposition of Application: <br />None heard. 4 <br />Public Present in Favor of A • •licatio <br />None heard. <br />Meseck asked the applicants if the lot c ited the size of the <br />applicant's deck. <br />John Engelland, applicant, stated it was more financial than anything else. <br />Public Hearing Closed / Board Discussion: <br />Stuart made a motion to approve. Meseck seconded the motion. <br />Roll Call Vot <br />Chris Fuller, Chair <br />'absent <br />Leslie Ewy, Vice C <br />Yes <br />James Stuart <br />Yes <br />Christine Niska <br />Yes <br />Andrew Meseck <br />Yes <br />Gunnar Malmquist <br />Yes <br />Carl Borrmann <br />Yes <br />Motion passed: <br />6 to 0 <br />Discussion Items <br />The board asked for an update on the City Council study session. <br />McCartney stated there was a good discussion at the study session. He stated City <br />Council wanted a quick fix. He stated the best approach would be a neighborhood plan <br />so that this could be reviewed in detail. To address Council's quick fix, staff will be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.