My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2000 04 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2000 Planning Commission Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2000 04 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:13 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 2:11:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2000 04 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Commissioner McDermott suggested putting a parapet wall off of the molding that is already <br />around the building now. It would look like it is a flattop building, but within it would be the <br />sloped surface where you would have the plastic material. That way it would assume a similar <br />architecture that the building already has, you wouldn’t be able to see it from the street and you <br />would still have the direct sunlight coming in to be able to give you the windows. Mr. <br />McDermott would also like to see something done about the parking situation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish likes the look of the building. Ms. Kalish asked if the applicant has thought <br />about using recycled PVC. Mr. Ferenc stated that the manufacture uses a meaningful percentage <br />of recycled plastic in the material. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard is concerned with the roofing. He would like to see better options and <br />other considerations. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Manjeet Ranu stated that Staff is recommending approval with two conditions in Resolution No. <br />14, Series 2000. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Comments / Vote: <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson supports Bill McDermott’s suggestion. <br /> <br />Commissioner McDermott thinks that with a parapet wall up, he would not have any problems <br />with this at all. It would take away the issues of the reflective light as well as the casual light <br />coming from underneath. He thinks that it would enhance the look of the building. He likes the <br />latticework. <br /> <br />All Planning Commissioners liked Bill McDermott’s suggestion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton stated that the Planning Commission could try to give the applicant <br />direction and give Staff some flexibility in approving something. Or, they can come back with <br />another rendition. <br /> <br />Motion made by Bill McDermott for a continuance of Resolution No. 14, Series 2000, to the May <br />9, 2000, Planning Commission meeting. Seconded by Chris Pritchard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard asked if the applicant necessarily has to take their recommendation. Can <br />they take it to City Council? Is this the equivalent of a denial? <br /> <br />Paul Wood stated that Staff needs a recommendation before moving forward to City Council, <br />whether that is denial or recommendations of approval with conditions. An option would be for <br /> <br /> 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.