Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for. Does it simply require those requesting underground construction to pay the differential or <br />simply require Public Service to underground when parties pay? He would like to see the <br />underground alternative be given equal consideration along with the other alternatives. If there <br />are any poles at all, they should be located in the same place. People moved into their houses <br />with the expectation that that would stay the same. Under grounding makes more sense. <br /> <br />Michael J. Smith, 788 West Tamarisk Street, Louisville, CO 80027. This is a significant impact to <br />the community. This is not a minor upgrade to a facility that has been there for a long period of <br />time. Mr. Smith moved in next to a 65-foot pole and it may become an 85 to 95-foot pole based <br />on PSCO proposal. He has been examining power poles and the ornamental steel poles that are <br />proposed. They appear to be placed on a concrete structure. He questions the 10% plus 2 feet <br />would come off of that based on their proposed design. Under grounding is the way to go. <br /> <br />Carrie DeGraw, 741 Orchard Drive, Louisville, CO 80027. Ms. DeGraw would like for the rest <br />of Louisville to know about the power line proposal. She suggested putting a flyer in with the <br />water bills to inform the whole city. She would also like to know why the power has gone out <br />three times recently. <br /> <br />Lynn Willis, 763 Orchard Drive, Louisville, CO 80027. Ms. Willis feels that this is just as <br />important as all of the issues that the Planning Commission generally looks at. She does have <br />personal concerns regarding health affects and does not feel that inconclusive reports do not mean <br />that there is not a problem. She feels that this will affect the entire community and now is the <br />time to make a change. Ms. Willis asked how much line within the city limits would need to be <br />buried. She would also like to see them look at burying the lines along the highly populated areas, <br />the residential areas and the schools. <br /> <br />Kate Myers, 902 West Alder Street, Louisville, CO 80027. Would like to see all of the lines <br />under grounded. As a taxpayer she would be happy to pay more taxes to pay for this upgrade. <br /> <br />Christopher Westdyke, 764 Lois Court, Louisville, CO 80027. Mr. Westdyke asked what other <br />residential communities have not accepted these poles and have under grounded them. He would <br />also like to see an official comprehensive disclosure list. He would also like to know who bore <br />the cost of the burial. How are other Public Service companies in the greater west doing and in <br />other parts of the country. How are they handling some of these issues? Was this area zoned and <br />established as residential at the time the applicant retained their right-of-way? Where did the 62% <br />attributable to the City of Louisville specific numbers come from and can they have the specific <br />numbers and breakdown. Can they have specific numbers of repair for above ground and <br />underground and cost per instance of power line failure? Regardless of intentions would this be <br />providing the applicant with tacit approval to run poles up to the maximum height, which in many <br />cases is a 50% increase. Does the community of Louisville have the authority and option to keep <br />the power lines and poles exactly as they are requiring the applicant to find other routes to <br />achieve their aim? Will new power poles potentially be relocated along the right-of-way behind <br />homes that are currently free from this obstruction? Is this or is this not a systemic or grid issue in <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br />