Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for Public Service Company of Colorado. <br /> <br />Whereas the Louisville Planning Commission finds that the requested Special Review Use will be <br />contrary to the general welfare and economic prosperity of the immediate neighborhoods, and <br /> <br />Whereas that the proposed use and development will not lend economic stability compatible with <br />the character of the surrounding established areas, and; <br /> <br />Whereas that the external effects of the proposal are not controlled considering compatibility of <br />land use to prevent the occurrence of nuisances and other factors deemed to effect public health, <br />welfare, safety and convenience. <br /> <br />Be it resolved that the Louisville Planning Commission denies the request of the Special Review <br />Use. The Planning Commission recommends to the Louisville City Council that the Public <br />Service Company be allowed to utilize its legally obtained right-of-ways and easements as related <br />to these transmission facilities only according to existing legal entitlements. <br /> <br />Further, the Louisville Planning Commission recommends that the Louisville City Council <br />negotiate with the Public Service Company to ultimately bury or relocate the existing facilities if <br />economically and technically feasible.” <br /> <br />This is the motion that he will propose at the end of the meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kalish thanked Public Service Company for all of the work they have done on this <br />project. She also thanked the members of the community for giving their opinions, thoughts and <br />feelings about this issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard stated that if this motion to deny is submitted by the Chair, he would <br />second it. <br /> <br />Commissioner McAvinew feels that the record has been established and the facts have been set. <br />Mr. McAvinew would like to see the lines buried if there are any additions or upgrades to them. <br />He is also ready to vote on this application. <br /> <br />Paul Wood made a comment relative to part of the motion of the Commission. Staff recommends <br />that if it is the direction of Planning Commission as a whole to move forward with this motion <br />that it would be important to direct Staff to prepare additional findings for denial and then take <br />final consideration of that on June 13. This is not just a recommendation, based on the fact the <br />legal opinion has not been finalized; Mr. Wood would like to prepare findings at the <br />Commission’s direction that he can review with the City Attorney’s office for the record. <br /> <br />Chairman Lipton stated that the way the motion is worded that they are not at this time relying on <br />any specific legal judgment or opinion as to what their entitlements are. He thinks that is <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br />