Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the existing and potentially expanded future emergency vehicle and fire fighter access traffic is not <br />in the best interest of public safety and firefighter safety. He would recommend and request that <br />the Planning Commission denies approval for this project until a separate access point can be <br />somehow figured out. <br /> <br />Chief Brewer went over the turning access with the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Mark Weber, 211 South Tyler Avenue, Louisville, CO 80027. Mr. Weber is presently elected to <br />the Board of Directors for the Louisville Fire Protection District and serves in capacity of <br />President of the Board of Directors. Mr. Weber wanted to make it clear that the only opposition <br />that they have to the project is the shared access of the current and existing driveway located next <br />to Station 1. Mr. Weber voiced all opposition to the proposed joint use of the concrete driveway <br />located next to Station 1 located at 1240 Main Street. The driveway currently sits on property <br />owned by the City of Louisville and in 1983 the Fire Protection District entered into a licensed <br />agreement with the city to construct a driveway for the purpose of enhancing emergency services <br />provided from Station 1. <br /> <br />It has been the Boards position since February of 2000 that shared use of this driveway created a <br />public safety issue. Shared access will ultimately put a firefighter or a firefighting apparatus in <br />direct contact with individuals who use the driveway to enter or exit the proposed business. <br />Sharing access will lead to delayed response times for the Fire Department and create a potential <br />liability scenario that the District is not willing to undertake. These are the reasons that the <br />Louisville Fire Protection District Board of Directors is opposed to the proposed driveway for the <br />proposed project. This is a safety issue. There are safety issues that are going to happen and the <br />District does not feel that they should be required to assume the responsibilities for those actions <br />should this be approved. They would go as far as to look for the applicant to assume all of those <br />responsibilities for any future problems that may occur if it is considered and passed. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Paul Wood stated that Staff is recommending approval of the Special Review Use and Final PUD <br />Development Plan with six conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Comments / Vote: <br /> <br />Commissioner McDermott asked how they currently exit and enter with only 24 feet at this time. <br />Chief Brewer stated that they have to use both lanes on Main Street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton thinks this is an attractive proposal in terms of the aesthetics and the <br /> <br /> 12 <br /> <br />